Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms
/ classification
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Medical History Taking
Middle Aged
Multifactorial Inheritance
/ genetics
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
/ genetics
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
breast
cancer
epidemiology
genetic
polygenic
prediction
risk
score
screening
stratification
Journal
American journal of human genetics
ISSN: 1537-6605
Titre abrégé: Am J Hum Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370475
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2019
03 01 2019
Historique:
received:
09
08
2018
accepted:
03
11
2018
pubmed:
18
12
2018
medline:
5
11
2019
entrez:
18
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30554720
pii: S0002-9297(18)30405-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
pmc: PMC6323553
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21-34Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0707-10031
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_14105
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R25 CA092049
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1287/A10710
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1287/A16563
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1214-20016
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P012930/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA116201
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
ID : GPH-129344
Pays : Canada
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10118
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10124
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA148065
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10119
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_12028
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):353-61, 361e1-2
pubmed: 23535729
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Nov 15;180(10):1018-27
pubmed: 25255808
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 08;107(5):
pubmed: 25855707
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Dec 5;93(6):1046-60
pubmed: 24290378
Nat Genet. 2016 Jul;48(7):817-20
pubmed: 27270105
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):349-51
pubmed: 23535723
Genet Epidemiol. 2017 May;41(4):320-331
pubmed: 28393391
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jan 27;109(5):
pubmed: 28130475
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 12;106(11):
pubmed: 25392194
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1219-1224
pubmed: 30104762
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):526-536
pubmed: 29315403
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22
pubmed: 20808728
Nat Genet. 2017 Dec;49(12):1767-1778
pubmed: 29058716
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):126-135
pubmed: 27697780
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;2(10):1295-1302
pubmed: 27228256
Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):373-80
pubmed: 25751625
Ann Oncol. 2015 Mar;26(3):517-22
pubmed: 25488685
PLoS Genet. 2014 Apr 17;10(4):e1004234
pubmed: 24743097
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 21;110(2):535-45
pubmed: 24346285
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;35(6):549-56
pubmed: 21769933
Br J Cancer. 2011 May 10;104(10):1656-63
pubmed: 21468051
Biostatistics. 2015 Jan;16(1):143-54
pubmed: 25027274
Bioinformatics. 2010 Sep 1;26(17):2190-1
pubmed: 20616382
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Apr 1;23(7):1934-46
pubmed: 24242184
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2202-4
pubmed: 23744280
Nature. 2017 Nov 2;551(7678):92-94
pubmed: 29059683
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Apr 4;92(4):489-503
pubmed: 23540573
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Sep;19(9):581-590
pubmed: 29789686
PLoS Genet. 2016 Dec 30;12(12):e1006493
pubmed: 28036406
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):251-8
pubmed: 26628467
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jul 1;109(7):
pubmed: 28376175