The liver-first approach for locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.


Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 22 07 2018
revised: 16 11 2018
accepted: 08 12 2018
pubmed: 18 12 2018
medline: 18 4 2019
entrez: 18 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and synchronous liver metastases (sRLM) can be treated according to the liver-first approach. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for completing treatment and in how many patients extensive lower pelvic surgery might have been omitted. Retrospective analysis of all patients with LARC and sRLM treated at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute according to the liver-first between 2003 and 2016. In total 129 consecutive patients were included. In 90 patients (70%) the liver-first was completed. Ten patients had a (near) complete response (ypT0-1N0) of their primary tumour. In 36 out of 39 patients not completing the liver-first protocol palliative rectum resection was withheld. Optimal cut-offs for CEA level (53.15 μg/L), size (3.85 cm) and number (4) of RLMs were identified. A preoperative CEA level above 53.15 μg/L was an independent predictor for non-completion of the liver-first protocol (p = 0.005). Ten patients had a (near) complete response of their primary tumour and, in retrospect, rectum sparing therapies could have been considered. Together with 36 patient in whom palliative rectum resection was not necessary this entails that nearly 40% patients with LARC and sRLM might be spared major pelvic surgery if the liver-first approach is applied. A predictor (CEA) was found for non-completion of the liver-first protocol. The majority of patients underwent resection of both primary tumour and hepatic metastasis with curative intent. These findings together entail that the liver-first approach may be considered in patients with LARC and sRLM.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and synchronous liver metastases (sRLM) can be treated according to the liver-first approach. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for completing treatment and in how many patients extensive lower pelvic surgery might have been omitted.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of all patients with LARC and sRLM treated at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute according to the liver-first between 2003 and 2016.
RESULTS
In total 129 consecutive patients were included. In 90 patients (70%) the liver-first was completed. Ten patients had a (near) complete response (ypT0-1N0) of their primary tumour. In 36 out of 39 patients not completing the liver-first protocol palliative rectum resection was withheld. Optimal cut-offs for CEA level (53.15 μg/L), size (3.85 cm) and number (4) of RLMs were identified. A preoperative CEA level above 53.15 μg/L was an independent predictor for non-completion of the liver-first protocol (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
Ten patients had a (near) complete response of their primary tumour and, in retrospect, rectum sparing therapies could have been considered. Together with 36 patient in whom palliative rectum resection was not necessary this entails that nearly 40% patients with LARC and sRLM might be spared major pelvic surgery if the liver-first approach is applied. A predictor (CEA) was found for non-completion of the liver-first protocol. The majority of patients underwent resection of both primary tumour and hepatic metastasis with curative intent. These findings together entail that the liver-first approach may be considered in patients with LARC and sRLM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30554788
pii: S0748-7983(18)32029-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.007
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Carcinoembryonic Antigen 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

591-596

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

P M H Nierop (PMH)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

M Verseveld (M)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

B Galjart (B)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

J Rothbarth (J)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

J J M E Nuyttens (JJME)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

E van Meerten (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

J W A Burger (JWA)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

D J Grünhagen (DJ)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

C Verhoef (C)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.verhoef@erasmusmc.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH