Quantifying Burn Injury-Related Disability and Quality of Life in the Developing World: A Primer for Patient-Centered Resource Allocation.

BACKGROUND

Untreated or undertreated burns are commonly encountered by plastic surgeons on medical trips in India and represent a major cause of disability. We sought to utilize validated patient-reported outcomes instruments to identify the patient population with the greatest burn-related disability in order to appropriately allocate plastic surgery resources to those in greatest need.

METHODS

The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Burn-Specific Health Scale-Revised, Brief, and Adapted questionnaires were administered via an interpreter during a plastic surgery trip to Jharkhand, India, in January 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and burn-specific history were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight postburn patients were surveyed (mean age, 17.0 ± 9.2 years; male:female ratio, 1:2.5). Mean time from injury was 4.74 years. No patient had received formal, primary burn care. Mechanism of injury: flame (39%), oil (32%), scalding water (14%), and other (14%). Fifty-four percent were extremity burns; 25%, facial; and 18%, neck burns. The Burn-Specific Health Scale-Revised, Brief, and Adapted demonstrated that the most significantly impacted domains for all patients were body image and skin sensitivity, with more than 80% of patients complaining of issues with skin sensitivity. In addition, children (aged <18 years) had diminished body image domain scores. RAND SF-36 scores were lowest in the energy (73.1 ± 25.0) and general health (76.5 ± 13.8) domains, and females with extremity burns demonstrated statistically significant decreases in their physical limitation domain scores (85.9 ± 17.3, P < 0.05). Females with extremity burns also had statistically significant lower scores in the energy domain (64.09 ± 25.75) as compared with their male counterparts with extremity burns (100 ± 0, P = 0.045). In general, females scored lower than did males in multiple domains, and those results reached statistical significance in the energy (65.9 ± 24.6 vs 93.6 ± 10.9), emotional (77.2 ± 21.5 vs 95.4 ± 11.2), and general health domains (71.1 ± 11.9 vs 90.0 ± 7.5) with P < 0.05. Children demonstrated significantly diminished scores in the emotional (75.5 ± 24.6) and general health (79.1 ± 11.8) domains.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate the significant impact on quality of life that untreated burns have in this population. Male and female children with extremity burns and adult women with extremity burns were most significantly affected in multiple domains. Consequently, children and adult women with extremity burns appear to be the patient cohort with the greatest opportunity to impact their quality of life. These data may be utilized to improve patient triage and resource allocation for future surgical trips but could also be of significant benefit to internal health agencies and ministries for the same purpose.