The Insurance Approval Process for Proton Radiation Therapy: A Significant Barrier to Patient Care.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Humans
Insurance Claim Review
/ statistics & numerical data
Insurance Coverage
/ statistics & numerical data
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Medicare
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Prior Authorization
/ statistics & numerical data
Proton Therapy
/ economics
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ statistics & numerical data
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Thoracic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Time-to-Treatment
/ statistics & numerical data
United States
Young Adult
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 07 2019
15 07 2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2018
revised:
05
12
2018
accepted:
09
12
2018
pubmed:
18
12
2018
medline:
20
12
2019
entrez:
18
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proton therapy is increasingly prescribed for cancer treatment, given its potential for improvements in clinical outcomes and toxicity reduction; however, insurance coverage continues to be a barrier to patient access. This study examined insurance approval and appeal outcomes at a large-volume proton therapy center to clarify the process and identify areas for improvement. In 2013 to 2016, 1753 patients with thoracic or head and neck cancer were considered for proton therapy; 903 (553 thoracic, 350 head and neck) entered the insurance process. Rates of and times to approval and successful appeal after initial denial were calculated. Clinical factors were evaluated for association with insurance outcomes via logistic regression. Approval rates by Medicare (n = 538) and private insurance (n = 365) were 91% and 30% on initial request, at a median 3 days and 14 days from inquiry to determination. Of the 306 patients initially denied coverage, 276 appealed the decision, and denial was overturned for 189 patients (68%; median time, 21 days from initial inquiry). On multivariable analysis, Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 14.20; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of initial approval. Approval rates decreased from 2013 to 2014 versus 2015 to 2016 (OR 0.54; P = .001). For patients who appealed denial, multivariable analysis found no associations between approval and trial enrollment or tumor type. Submission of a comparison treatment plan (proton vs photon) indicating dosimetric advantage to normal tissues was associated with decreased likelihood of approval (OR 0.43; P = .006), as was a prescribed dose of ≥66 Gy (OR 0.48; P = .019). Despite an 87% ultimate approval rate for proton therapy, the insurance process is a resource-intensive barrier to patient access associated with significant time delays to cancer treatment. These findings, plus the lack of clinical correlates with insurance outcomes, highlight a need for increased efficiency, transparency, and collaboration among stakeholders to promote timely patient care and research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30557675
pii: S0360-3016(18)34185-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.019
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
724-733Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.