A phase 2 trial of regorafenib as a single agent in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, advanced, and metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma.


Journal

Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 03 2019
Historique:
received: 14 09 2018
revised: 15 10 2018
accepted: 23 10 2018
pubmed: 19 12 2018
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 19 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biliary tract cancers are rare, aggressive neoplasms. Most patients present with advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis, and no second-line regimen has demonstrated clinical benefit. This was a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients who had advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease after receiving standard therapy. In this single arm-study, patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy received regorafenib once daily on a schedule of 21-days on/7-days off in a 28-day cycle. Patients initially received a standard 160 mg dose. After toxicity assessments in the first 3 patients, the dose was reduced to 120 mg for subsequent patients, as preplanned. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), the objective response rate, and the disease control rate. Forty-three patients received at least 1 dose of regorafenib, and 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of treatment were evaluable for tumor response. The median PFS was 15.6 weeks (90% confidence interval, 12.9-24.7 weeks), and the median OS was 31.8 weeks (90% confidence interval, 13.3-74.3 weeks), with survival rates 40% at 12 months and 32% at 18 months. A partial response was achieved in 5 patients (11%), and 19 had stable disease (44%), for a disease control rate of 56%. The toxicity profile was as expected, with grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in 40% of patients. The most common toxicities were hypophosphatemia (40%), hyperbilirubinemia (26%), hypertension (23%), and hand-foot skin reaction (7%). The current results suggest promising efficacy of regorafenib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, warranting further studies to confirm its clinical efficacy. There is a clear unmet need for effective therapies in patients who have advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Biliary tract cancers are rare, aggressive neoplasms. Most patients present with advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis, and no second-line regimen has demonstrated clinical benefit. This was a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients who had advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease after receiving standard therapy.
METHODS
In this single arm-study, patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy received regorafenib once daily on a schedule of 21-days on/7-days off in a 28-day cycle. Patients initially received a standard 160 mg dose. After toxicity assessments in the first 3 patients, the dose was reduced to 120 mg for subsequent patients, as preplanned. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), the objective response rate, and the disease control rate.
RESULTS
Forty-three patients received at least 1 dose of regorafenib, and 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of treatment were evaluable for tumor response. The median PFS was 15.6 weeks (90% confidence interval, 12.9-24.7 weeks), and the median OS was 31.8 weeks (90% confidence interval, 13.3-74.3 weeks), with survival rates 40% at 12 months and 32% at 18 months. A partial response was achieved in 5 patients (11%), and 19 had stable disease (44%), for a disease control rate of 56%. The toxicity profile was as expected, with grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in 40% of patients. The most common toxicities were hypophosphatemia (40%), hyperbilirubinemia (26%), hypertension (23%), and hand-foot skin reaction (7%).
CONCLUSIONS
The current results suggest promising efficacy of regorafenib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, warranting further studies to confirm its clinical efficacy. There is a clear unmet need for effective therapies in patients who have advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30561756
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31872
pmc: PMC6402964
mid: NIHMS995036
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Antineoplastic Agents 0
Phenylurea Compounds 0
Pyridines 0
regorafenib 24T2A1DOYB

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

902-909

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA047904
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Références

Hepatology. 2014 Sep;60(3):1107-8
pubmed: 24327308
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):882-7
pubmed: 24423918
Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 21;100(8):1257-66
pubmed: 19319137
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Dec;5(6):408-13
pubmed: 25436118
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 29;98(2):418-25
pubmed: 18087285
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3491-7
pubmed: 20530271
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Dec;87:122-130
pubmed: 29145038
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;211:45-56
pubmed: 30069758
Cancer Discov. 2017 Sep;7(9):943-962
pubmed: 28818953
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Aug;30(4):1646-51
pubmed: 21748296
Oncol Lett. 2017 May;13(5):2957-2964
pubmed: 28529557
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):56-66
pubmed: 27932229
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30
pubmed: 26742998
Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46(8):872-6
pubmed: 24997986
Acta Oncol. 2011 Apr;50(3):448-54
pubmed: 20670085
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):68-72
pubmed: 19935794
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jan;48(2):196-201
pubmed: 22176869
Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1003-10
pubmed: 26258846
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Chemotherapy. 2008;54(6):479-84
pubmed: 18832821
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 21;16(1):117
pubmed: 27655244
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):967-78
pubmed: 26179201
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):303-12
pubmed: 23177514
PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 13;10(2):e1004135
pubmed: 24550739
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;15(2):95-111
pubmed: 28994423
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):17246-17257
pubmed: 27783997
Int J Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;129(1):245-55
pubmed: 21170960
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1303-14
pubmed: 16214602
Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug;32(4):348-52
pubmed: 19363436
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):295-302
pubmed: 23177515
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Jul;12(7):1322-31
pubmed: 23619301
Int J Cancer. 2014 Sep 15;135(6):1487-96
pubmed: 24347491
Gastroenterology. 2013 Dec;145(6):1215-29
pubmed: 24140396
Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(4):234-239
pubmed: 28874891
Anticancer Res. 2015 Jan;35(1):371-7
pubmed: 25550574
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):291-300
pubmed: 26405193
Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):594-9
pubmed: 27000463
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;65(4):641-7
pubmed: 19652971

Auteurs

Weijing Sun (W)

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Westwood, Kansas.
University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, Kansas.

Anuj Patel (A)

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Harvard University and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Daniel Normolle (D)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Krishna Patel (K)

Texas Oncology, Round Rock, Texas.

James Ohr (J)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

James J Lee (JJ)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Nathan Bahary (N)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Edward Chu (E)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Natalie Streeter (N)

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, Kansas.

Summer Drummond (S)

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Research Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH