[Fixation of bony avulsions of the posterior cruciate ligament by a suture-bridge™ technique].
Refixation tibialer knöcherner Avulsionsverletzungen des hinteren Kreuzbandes in Fadenankertechnik.
Fractures, avulsion
Knee joint
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Suture anchors
Suture techniques
Journal
Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie
ISSN: 1439-0981
Titre abrégé: Oper Orthop Traumatol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9604937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
29
05
2018
accepted:
09
10
2018
revised:
09
10
2018
pubmed:
20
12
2018
medline:
7
9
2019
entrez:
20
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anatomical reduction of bony avulsions of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) by a suture-bridge™ (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) technique to restore posterior knee stability. Acute bony tibial avulsions of the PCL and multifragmentary fractures. Chronic condition of avulsion fractures or posterior instability, advanced knee osteoarthritis, high-grade soft tissue injury, infection. Prone position, minimally invasive posterior medial approach, exposure and reduction of the bony fragment, positioning of the proximal suture-anchor (interfragment), suturing the PCL and knotting to achieve repositioning of the anterior part of the fragment, tighten both ends of the tape by two suture anchors distally to the PCL insertion to fix the posterior part of the fragment. Knee extension brace with posterior tibial support for 6 weeks, 20 kg partial weight-bearing and restricted flexion up to 90° for 6 weeks, physiotherapy in prone position from the first postoperative day. Full weight bearing after x‑ray and clinical control after 6 weeks. Since 2016, 6 cases of a bony avulsion of the PCL treated with this technique (mean age 38 years; range 17-60 years). Postoperative x‑ray at 6 weeks showed no fragment dislocation and complete bone healing. Irritation due to the anchor material was not observed up to 6 months postoperatively. No wound healing problems, infections, thrombosis or arthrofibrosis observed. No revisions. According to a recent review comparing the open with an arthroscopic fracture treatment the arthroscopic treatment may lead to a slightly higher subjective and objective outcome. Interestingly, the rate of arthrofibrosis was slightly elevated in the arthroscopic group. Seven of 18 included studies describe a suture fixation in case of a comminuted fracture. Especially in these cases a suture-bridge ™ fixation seems to be reasonable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30564842
doi: 10.1007/s00064-018-0582-4
pii: 10.1007/s00064-018-0582-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3-11Références
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1230-7
pubmed: 15262647
Arthroscopy. 2006 Feb;22(2):172-81
pubmed: 16458803
Arthroscopy. 2011 May;27(5):728-34
pubmed: 21398077
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Sep;24(4-5):348-53
pubmed: 23010885
Knee. 2013 Mar;20(2):96-9
pubmed: 23159153
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):216-9
pubmed: 2323134
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Jun 09;3(3):e377-82
pubmed: 25126507
Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;7(4):505-8
pubmed: 26640635
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1065-71
pubmed: 26775734
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jan;57(1):39-44
pubmed: 26831316
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):734-742
pubmed: 28437619
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 May;50(2):334-41
pubmed: 5651340