Dosage Compensation of the X Chromosomes in Bovine Germline, Early Embryos, and Somatic Tissues.
Journal
Genome biology and evolution
ISSN: 1759-6653
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101509707
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2019
01 01 2019
Historique:
accepted:
12
12
2018
pubmed:
20
12
2018
medline:
13
4
2019
entrez:
20
12
2018
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dosage compensation of the mammalian X chromosome (X) was proposed by Susumu Ohno as a mechanism wherein the inactivation of one X in females would lead to doubling the expression of the other. This would resolve the dosage imbalance between eutherian females (XX) versus male (XY) and between a single active X versus autosome pairs (A). Expression ratio of X- and A-linked genes has been relatively well studied in humans and mice, despite controversial results over the existence of upregulation of X-linked genes. Here we report the first comprehensive test of Ohno's hypothesis in bovine preattachment embryos, germline, and somatic tissues. Overall an incomplete dosage compensation (0.5 < X:A < 1) of expressed genes and an excess X dosage compensation (X:A > 1) of ubiquitously expressed "dosage-sensitive" genes were seen. No significant differences in X:A ratios were observed between bovine female and male somatic tissues, further supporting Ohno's hypothesis. Interestingly, preimplantation embryos manifested a unique pattern of X dosage compensation dynamics. Specifically, X dosage decreased after fertilization, indicating that the sperm brings in an inactive X to the matured oocyte. Subsequently, the activation of the bovine embryonic genome enhanced expression of X-linked genes and increased the X dosage. As a result, an excess compensation was exhibited from the 8-cell stage to the compact morula stage. The X dosage peaked at the 16-cell stage and stabilized after the blastocyst stage. Together, our findings confirm Ohno's hypothesis of X dosage compensation in the bovine and extend it by showing incomplete and over-compensation for expressed and "dosage-sensitive" genes, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30566637
pii: 5253178
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy270
pmc: PMC6354180
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
242-252Références
Genomics. 2007 Oct;90(4):453-63
pubmed: 17728098
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;126(1-2):139-47
pubmed: 20016163
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2011 Apr 19;6(1):9
pubmed: 21504602
Nature. 2011 Apr 21;472(7343):370-4
pubmed: 21471966
Curr Genomics. 2007 Apr;8(2):129-36
pubmed: 18660847
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 18;111(11):4139-44
pubmed: 24591639
Dev Cell. 2017 Feb 6;40(3):289-301.e3
pubmed: 28132849
Reproduction. 2011 Jun;141(6):801-8
pubmed: 21411694
BMC Genomics. 2014 Sep 04;15:756
pubmed: 25185836
Nat Protoc. 2016 Sep;11(9):1650-67
pubmed: 27560171
Trends Biochem Sci. 2015 Jun;40(6):309-17
pubmed: 25937627
Nat Genet. 2011 Nov 28;43(12):1167-9; author reply 1171-2
pubmed: 22120048
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jul;100(7):5491-5500
pubmed: 28477999
EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):619-27
pubmed: 1371464
Anim Reprod Sci. 2012 Sep;134(1-2):56-63
pubmed: 22944169
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Apr;71(8):1383-94
pubmed: 24173285
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 15;5:14101
pubmed: 26370379
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Jan 24;13(3):189-203
pubmed: 22269907
BMC Genomics. 2016 Jan 27;17:81
pubmed: 26818975
Trends Microbiol. 2004 Apr;12(4):148-54
pubmed: 15116722
Nat Genet. 2010 Dec;42(12):1043-7
pubmed: 21102464
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 3;109(14):5346-51
pubmed: 22392987
Zygote. 2000 Feb;8(1):87-96
pubmed: 10840878
Biol Reprod. 1999 Mar;60(3):769-75
pubmed: 10026129
Hum Genet. 2011 Aug;130(2):237-45
pubmed: 21614513
Ann Hum Genet. 1980 Oct;44(2):151-78
pubmed: 7316468
Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):857-62
pubmed: 14661031
Nature. 1961 Apr 22;190:372-3
pubmed: 13764598
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D1049-56
pubmed: 25428369
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Mar;14(3):141-52
pubmed: 23429793
Genetica. 2016 Aug;144(4):435-44
pubmed: 27376899
Mol Reprod Dev. 2010 Jul;77(7):615-21
pubmed: 20578062
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):18905-10
pubmed: 17142320
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 14;112(15):4618-23
pubmed: 25825726
Trends Genet. 2001 Dec;17(12):697-701
pubmed: 11718922
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 17;109(29):11752-7
pubmed: 22753487
Nat Genet. 2006 Jan;38(1):47-53
pubmed: 16341221
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 22;113(12):3197-202
pubmed: 26951653
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13
pubmed: 19033363
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Nat Genet. 2011 Oct 23;43(12):1179-85
pubmed: 22019781
J Biol. 2006;5(1):3
pubmed: 16507155
Exp Cell Res. 1959 Oct;18:415-8
pubmed: 14428474
Annu Rev Genet. 1997;31:571-610
pubmed: 9442908
Mol Reprod Dev. 1990 May;26(1):90-100
pubmed: 2189447
J Genomics. 2015 Jan 01;3:1-19
pubmed: 25628761
Reproduction. 2005 Dec;130(6):791-9
pubmed: 16322539
BMC Genomics. 2013 Mar 06;14:150
pubmed: 23497106
Biol Reprod. 2016 Jan;94(1):19
pubmed: 26607721
Nat Genet. 2002 Jun;31(2):216-20
pubmed: 12032569
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 16;105(50):19768-73
pubmed: 19064908
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;147(2-3):81-94
pubmed: 26730606
Trends Genet. 2008 May;24(5):238-45
pubmed: 18378036
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013 Jul;70(14):2443-61
pubmed: 23052214