The experience of virtual reality: are individual differences in mental imagery associated with sense of presence?
Control of mental imagery
Immersive virtual reality
Individual differences
Mental imagery ability
Presence
Vividness of mental imagery
Journal
Cognitive processing
ISSN: 1612-4790
Titre abrégé: Cogn Process
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101177984
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
accepted:
14
12
2018
pubmed:
21
12
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
21
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The concept of "presence" describes the quality of subjective experience in immersive virtual reality (IVR). Presence refers to a specific state of consciousness: we behave and feel as if we actually were in the virtual world even though we know there is nothing there. In their handbook of Virtual Reality, Burdea and Coiffet (Virtual reality technology, Wiley, New York, 2003) suggested that the experience of presence in IVR would emerge from the combination of three Is: Immersion or capacity to isolate from the external world, Interaction or capacity to naturally exploring the virtual environment, and Imagination or individual aptitudes with mental imagery. So far, several studies have investigated the technological and psychological factors affecting the degree of immersion and interaction. However, no study has explored the relationship between perceived presence and mental imagery. Here we aim at filling this gap through a correlational study comparing self-reports about sense of presence and mental imagery abilities. After experiencing two IVR scenarios (an art gallery and a living room), 142 male and female users were administered with questionnaires assessing the degree of presence (Igroup Presence Questionnaire), the degree of vividness (Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire) and control (Test of Visual Imagery Control) of subjective mental images. Results showed a clear positive correlation between presence and vividness: the higher the vividness of mental images the stronger the reported sense of presence felt in IVR scenarios. Instead, the capacity to control mental imagery showed a weaker association with presence. We may conclude that individual differences in the degree of perceived presence and mental imagery ability are associated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30569268
doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0897-y
pii: 10.1007/s10339-018-0897-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
291-298Références
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):635-42
pubmed: 11533731
Br J Psychol. 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):29-44
pubmed: 12648387
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Aug;6(4):421-7
pubmed: 14511455
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jul;29(7):819-33
pubmed: 15018671
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):332-9
pubmed: 15803164
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):79-100
pubmed: 17162509
Br J Psychol Gen Sect. 1949 Mar;39(3):156-67
pubmed: 18127238
Memory. 2008 Nov;16(8):821-35
pubmed: 18780239
Brain Res Rev. 2009 May;60(2):306-26
pubmed: 19167426
Cogn Process. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 2:S268-71
pubmed: 19693586
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 12;364(1535):3549-57
pubmed: 19884149
Perception. 2010;39(7):953-69
pubmed: 20842972
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(2):354-9
pubmed: 2319447
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1232-1240
pubmed: 27785567
Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Oct;69(2):459-65
pubmed: 2812992
Child Dev. 1985 Dec;56(6):1479-98
pubmed: 4075870
Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24
pubmed: 4742442
Psychol Bull. 1995 Mar;117(2):250-70
pubmed: 7724690
Br J Psychol. 1994 Nov;85 ( Pt 4):479-500
pubmed: 7812670
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Feb;35(2):153-8
pubmed: 9046678