Heterochronic reproductive developmental processes between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Paspalum rufum.

Paspalum rufum Apomixis apospory apospory initial heterochrony polyploidy reproductive development sexuality

Journal

Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 05 2019
Historique:
received: 07 06 2018
accepted: 28 11 2018
pubmed: 24 12 2018
medline: 23 2 2020
entrez: 22 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Apomixis is an asexual reproductive mode via seeds that generate maternal clonal progenies. Although apomixis in grasses is mainly expressed at the polyploid level, some natural diploid genotypes of Paspalum rufum produce aposporous embryo sacs in relatively high proportions and are even able to complete apomixis under specific conditions. However, despite the potential for apomixis, sexuality prevails in diploids, and apomixis expression is repressed for an as yet undetermind reason. Apomixis is thought to derive from a deregulation of one or a few components of the sexual pathway that could be triggered by polyploidy and/or hybridization. The objectives of this work were to characterize and compare the reproductive development and the timing of apospory initial (AI) emergence between diploid genotypes with potential for apomixis and facultative apomictic tetraploid cytotypes of P. rufum. Reproductive characterization was performed by cytoembryological observations of cleared ovaries and anthers during all reproductive development steps and by quantitative evaluation of the ovule growth parameters. Cytoembryological observations showed that in diploids, both female and male reproductive development is equally synchronized, but in tetraploids, megasporogenesis and early megagametogenesis are delayed with respect to microsporogenesis and early microgametogenesis. This delay was also seen when ovary growth was taken as a reference parameter. The analysis of the onset of AIs revealed that they emerge during different developmental periods depending on the ploidy level. In diploids, the AIs appeared along with the tetrad (or triad) of female meiocytes, but in tetraploids they appeared earlier, at the time of the megaspore mother cell. In both cytotypes, AIs can be seen even during megagametogenesis. Overall observations reveal that female sexual reproductive development is delayed in tetraploids as compared with diploid genotypes, mainly at meiosis. In tetraploids, AIs appear at earlier sexual developmental stages than in diploids, and they accumulate up to the end of megasporogenesis. The longer extension of megasporogenesis in tetraploids could favour AI emergence and also apomixis success.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Apomixis is an asexual reproductive mode via seeds that generate maternal clonal progenies. Although apomixis in grasses is mainly expressed at the polyploid level, some natural diploid genotypes of Paspalum rufum produce aposporous embryo sacs in relatively high proportions and are even able to complete apomixis under specific conditions. However, despite the potential for apomixis, sexuality prevails in diploids, and apomixis expression is repressed for an as yet undetermind reason. Apomixis is thought to derive from a deregulation of one or a few components of the sexual pathway that could be triggered by polyploidy and/or hybridization. The objectives of this work were to characterize and compare the reproductive development and the timing of apospory initial (AI) emergence between diploid genotypes with potential for apomixis and facultative apomictic tetraploid cytotypes of P. rufum.
METHODS
Reproductive characterization was performed by cytoembryological observations of cleared ovaries and anthers during all reproductive development steps and by quantitative evaluation of the ovule growth parameters.
KEY RESULTS
Cytoembryological observations showed that in diploids, both female and male reproductive development is equally synchronized, but in tetraploids, megasporogenesis and early megagametogenesis are delayed with respect to microsporogenesis and early microgametogenesis. This delay was also seen when ovary growth was taken as a reference parameter. The analysis of the onset of AIs revealed that they emerge during different developmental periods depending on the ploidy level. In diploids, the AIs appeared along with the tetrad (or triad) of female meiocytes, but in tetraploids they appeared earlier, at the time of the megaspore mother cell. In both cytotypes, AIs can be seen even during megagametogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall observations reveal that female sexual reproductive development is delayed in tetraploids as compared with diploid genotypes, mainly at meiosis. In tetraploids, AIs appear at earlier sexual developmental stages than in diploids, and they accumulate up to the end of megasporogenesis. The longer extension of megasporogenesis in tetraploids could favour AI emergence and also apomixis success.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30576402
pii: 5257009
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy228
pmc: PMC6526369
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

901-915

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Jan 11;11:9
pubmed: 21223576
Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Aug;67(6):615-28
pubmed: 18481185
Development. 1997 May;124(10):2049-62
pubmed: 9169851
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1095-103
pubmed: 12831475
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Nov;89(5):599-605
pubmed: 24177936
Genet Mol Biol. 2012 Dec;35(4):827-37
pubmed: 23271945
Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Dec;32(6):1085-92
pubmed: 9002607
Ontogenez. 2007 Jan-Feb;38(1):5-11
pubmed: 17352289
Science. 2011 Feb 18;331(6019):876
pubmed: 21330535
Plant Mol Biol. 2014 Mar;84(4-5):479-95
pubmed: 24146222
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:509-37
pubmed: 18076331
Plant Cell. 2003 Jul;15(7):1524-37
pubmed: 12837944
Braz J Biol. 2010 May;70(2):351-60
pubmed: 20552147
Genetics. 2016 Nov;204(3):1045-1056
pubmed: 27591749
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):336-47
pubmed: 23127139
Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):441-50
pubmed: 24939990
Development. 2015 Jan 15;142(2):229-41
pubmed: 25564620
Plant Cell Rep. 2018 Feb;37(2):293-306
pubmed: 29080908
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jun;61(6):1869-83
pubmed: 20231327
Hereditas. 2001;134(1):35-42
pubmed: 11525063
Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1521-31
pubmed: 14668399
Sex Plant Reprod. 2011 Jun;24(2):137-47
pubmed: 21484604
Ann Bot. 2014 Jun;113(7):1211-8
pubmed: 24739230
Am J Bot. 2010 Oct;97(10):1719-31
pubmed: 21616805
Sex Plant Reprod. 2011 Mar;24(1):47-61
pubmed: 20596730
Plant J. 2000 Jan;21(1):97-108
pubmed: 10652155
Planta. 2011 Aug;234(2):217-27
pubmed: 21706335
Science. 2009 Jun 26;324(5935):1684-9
pubmed: 19498110
Trends Genet. 2001 Oct;17(10):597-604
pubmed: 11585667
Heredity (Edinb). 1998 Jan;80 ( Pt 1):33-9
pubmed: 9474774
Ann Bot. 2013 Sep;112(5):767-87
pubmed: 23864004
Sex Plant Reprod. 2011 Sep;24(3):231-46
pubmed: 21394488
Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(4):585-96
pubmed: 19247928
Am J Bot. 2005 Nov;92(11):1797-810
pubmed: 21646097
Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):628-32
pubmed: 20208518
Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2185-99
pubmed: 16024690
J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(5):1699-707
pubmed: 21335438
J Plant Res. 2016 Jul;129(4):697-710
pubmed: 26965283
Plant Cell. 2010 Oct;22(10):3249-67
pubmed: 21037104
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 18;12(4):e0175852
pubmed: 28419145

Auteurs

Mariano Soliman (M)

Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR), CONICET-UNR/Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Campo Experimental Villarino, Zavalla, Provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina.

Francisco Espinoza (F)

Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste (IBONE), CONICET-UNNE, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Casilla de Correo, Corrientes, Argentina.

Juan Pablo A Ortiz (JPA)

Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR), CONICET-UNR/Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Campo Experimental Villarino, Zavalla, Provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina.

Luciana Delgado (L)

Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR), CONICET-UNR/Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Campo Experimental Villarino, Zavalla, Provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH