[Does the micropulse laser have an effect on chronic CSC?]
Hat der Mikropulslaser bei chronischer CCS einen Effekt?
Central serous chorioretinopathy
Laser treatment
Macular edema
Micropulse
Optical coherence tomography
Journal
Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft
ISSN: 1433-0423
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmologe
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9206148
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
24
12
2018
medline:
7
9
2019
entrez:
23
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most common cause of vision loss without an evidence-based treatment recommendation. A positive effect of micropulse laser (MPL) treatment has been described in the literature in recent years. This study aimed to reappraise these results in a patient population with chronic CSC. Patients suffering from chronic CSC with a source point detectable in fluorescein angiography (longer than 3 months duration and unresponsive to treatment with eplerenone and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors) were identified and included in this prospective and consecutive case study. Patients were controlled with a yellow laser (577 nm) after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and then every 3 months. A total of 28 patients were included (28 eyes). The mean duration of anamnesis was 444 days (90-1412 days) and the mean duration of the observation period after MPL was 257 days (42-909 days). The foveal retinal thickness measured 351.7 ± 82.4 µm before, compared to 253.6 ± 86.48 µm after MPL (mean of all patients over the whole observation period). Visual acuity was 0.33 ± 0.21 logMAR prior to MPL and 0.30 ± 0.22 logMAR posttreatment. Of the patients two underwent a second MPL and three patients underwent photodynamic treatment (PDT) after insufficient clinical improvement and were consequently excluded from the study. Retinal thickness in this patient population with chronic CSC was significantly reduced after MPL treatment with no significant changes of visual acuity. No side effects of MPL were observed. Larger studies including control groups are warranted to quantify the effects of MPL further.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30578429
doi: 10.1007/s00347-018-0839-1
pii: 10.1007/s00347-018-0839-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Photosensitizing Agents
0
Porphyrins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
850-856Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;84(1):40-7
pubmed: 10611098
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2006;(302):51-69
pubmed: 17265790
Retina. 2012 Sep;32(8):1592-600
pubmed: 22466485
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 01;54(3):2216-24
pubmed: 23439599
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Jul;124:37-47
pubmed: 24800654
Retina. 2015 Mar;35(3):532-6
pubmed: 25127050
Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):258-64; quiz 265
pubmed: 25613846
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;253(12):2129-35
pubmed: 25717024
Retina. 2015 Aug;35(8):1594-603
pubmed: 25719988
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015 Sep;48:82-118
pubmed: 26026923
Ophthalmologica. 2015;234(4):189-94
pubmed: 26406874
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 03;9:2277-83
pubmed: 26664043
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:729792
pubmed: 26697211
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 Nov;73(2):545-552
pubmed: 27352351
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;255(2):243-254
pubmed: 27497611
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016 Nov 1;47(11):985-990
pubmed: 27842192
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1547-1555
pubmed: 29776672
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;256(11):2027-2034
pubmed: 30097783
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15;90(18):8643-7
pubmed: 8378341