Advanced Therapy in Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation: Effects on Outcomes During the First Year After Discharge.
Brain injuries
Occupational therapy
Physical therapy
Propensity score
Recreation therapy
Rehabilitation
Speech therapy
Journal
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
10
07
2018
revised:
03
11
2018
accepted:
06
11
2018
pubmed:
24
12
2018
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
23
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To use causal inference methods to determine if receipt of a greater proportion of inpatient rehabilitation treatment focused on higher level functions, for example, executive functions, ambulating over uneven surfaces (advanced therapy [AdvTx]), results in better rehabilitation outcomes. A cohort study using propensity score methods applied to the traumatic brain injury practice-based evidence (TBI-PBE) database, a database consisting of multisite, prospective, longitudinal observational data. Acute inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Patients enrolled in the TBI-PBE study (N=1843), aged 14 years or older, who sustained a severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI, receiving their first inpatient rehabilitation facility admission to 1 of 9 sites in the United States, and consented to follow-up 3 and 9 months postdischarge from inpatient rehabilitation. Not applicable. Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective-17, FIM motor and cognitive scores, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Controlling for measured potential confounders, increasing the percentage of AdvTx during inpatient TBI rehabilitation was found to be associated with better community participation, functional independence, life satisfaction, and decreased likelihood of depression during the year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Participants who began rehabilitation with greater disability experienced larger gains on some outcomes than those who began rehabilitation with more intact abilities. Increasing the proportion of treatment targeting higher level functions appears to have no detrimental and a small, beneficial effect on outcome. Caution should be exercised when inferring causality given that a large number of potential confounders could not be completely controlled with propensity score methods. Further, the extent to which unmeasured confounders influenced the findings is not known and could be of particular concern due to the potential for the patient's recovery trajectory to influence therapists' decisions to provide a greater amount of AdvTx.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30578774
pii: S0003-9993(18)31529-6
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1818-1826Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. All rights reserved.