High risk (B3) breast lesions: What is the incidence of malignancy for individual lesion subtypes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 04 10 2018
revised: 30 11 2018
accepted: 10 12 2018
pubmed: 24 12 2018
medline: 18 4 2019
entrez: 24 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Provide evidence to support evolving management strategies for high-risk (B3) breast lesions by assessing risk of carcinoma in subgroups of B3 lesions using systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases identified observational studies between 1980 and 2015 that reported on underestimation of malignancy following B3 lesion diagnosis at core needle biopsy. Critical appraisal, quality assessment, data extraction and meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate rate of malignancy of the whole B3 group and individual lesions. Study heterogeneity and association between variables and underestimation rate was investigated using random effects logistic modelling. Meta-analysis, using data from 129 studies, assessed 11 423 lesions of which 2160 were upgraded to malignancy after surgical excision biopsy (17% malignancy rate, 95% CI 15-19%). Malignancy rates varied from 6% in radial scars with no atypia (95% CI 2-13%, I2 72.8%), to 32% in papillomas with atypia (95% CI 23-41%, I2 57.4%). Differences in upgrade rates between atypical and non-atypical lesions were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Study heterogeneity could not be explained by differences in core biopsy size or year of publication. This comprehensive, inclusive assessment of all published literature, provides an accurate estimate of malignancy risk in subgroups of B3 lesions, to guide tailored management strategies. Some lesions have a high risk of malignancy, while others have a much lower risk, and could be safely managed with surveillance strategies rather than surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30579653
pii: S0748-7983(18)32030-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

519-527

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nerys Dawn Forester (ND)

Breast Screening and Assessment Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK. Electronic address: nerys.forester@nuth.nhs.uk.

Simon Lowes (S)

Breast Screening and Assessment Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, UK.

Elizabeth Mitchell (E)

Hull York Medical School, Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, The Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.

Maureen Twiddy (M)

Hull York Medical School, Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, The Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH