High risk (B3) breast lesions: What is the incidence of malignancy for individual lesion subtypes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
B3 breast lesions
Breast cancer
Lesions of uncertain malignant potential
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
04
10
2018
revised:
30
11
2018
accepted:
10
12
2018
pubmed:
24
12
2018
medline:
18
4
2019
entrez:
24
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Provide evidence to support evolving management strategies for high-risk (B3) breast lesions by assessing risk of carcinoma in subgroups of B3 lesions using systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases identified observational studies between 1980 and 2015 that reported on underestimation of malignancy following B3 lesion diagnosis at core needle biopsy. Critical appraisal, quality assessment, data extraction and meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate rate of malignancy of the whole B3 group and individual lesions. Study heterogeneity and association between variables and underestimation rate was investigated using random effects logistic modelling. Meta-analysis, using data from 129 studies, assessed 11 423 lesions of which 2160 were upgraded to malignancy after surgical excision biopsy (17% malignancy rate, 95% CI 15-19%). Malignancy rates varied from 6% in radial scars with no atypia (95% CI 2-13%, I2 72.8%), to 32% in papillomas with atypia (95% CI 23-41%, I2 57.4%). Differences in upgrade rates between atypical and non-atypical lesions were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Study heterogeneity could not be explained by differences in core biopsy size or year of publication. This comprehensive, inclusive assessment of all published literature, provides an accurate estimate of malignancy risk in subgroups of B3 lesions, to guide tailored management strategies. Some lesions have a high risk of malignancy, while others have a much lower risk, and could be safely managed with surveillance strategies rather than surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30579653
pii: S0748-7983(18)32030-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
519-527Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.