A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series of Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy as First-Line Approach in Ischemic Stroke and Review of the Literature.

The benefit of the direct aspiration thrombectomy (ADAPT) technique for the treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion are challenged after publishing of the ASTER trial that failed to show superiority of ADAPT compared to stent retriever. Aim of the present single-center study was a retrospective evaluation of the ADAPT technique comparing our results with literature. We retrospectively analyzed institutional data of stroke procedures in patients with mainstem occlusion of the middle cerebral artery treated between November 2016 and December 2017 with an initial attempt of manual thrombaspiration. Reperfusion rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction), procedural times, early clinical outcome and complications were recorded. Forty patients were treated by using direct thrombaspiration in middle cerebral artery mainstem occlusion. Median age was 67.5 (±17.8) years (m = 27.5%). Median Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 12 (IQR 7) preintervention and 3 (IQR 11) postintervention. Twenty-eight (70%) patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Successful recanalization (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥ 2b) could be achieved in 85% with direct aspiration alone. Mean time from groin puncture to recanalization was 25.2 ± 14.3 minutes. Embolization to new territories occurred in 1 of 40 (2.5%) cases and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 3 of 40 (7.5%). Nineteen of 40 (47.5%) patients achieved favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at discharge. The ADAPT technique presented as a safe and efficient first-line recanalization strategy with good clinical outcome for treatment of acute ischemic stroke resulting from large vessel occlusions in this single-center study and review of the literature. However, the concept of ADAPT as an equivalent first-line approach to stent retriever thrombectomy has to be proven by future randomized studies.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.