Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group.
Adult
Blood Donors
Busulfan
/ therapeutic use
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Graft Survival
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Myelofibrosis
/ mortality
Prognosis
Recurrence
Survival Analysis
Thiotepa
/ therapeutic use
Transplantation Conditioning
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Vidarabine
/ analogs & derivatives
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Busulfan
Myelofibrosis
Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen
Thiotepa
Journal
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
ISSN: 1523-6536
Titre abrégé: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9600628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
06
12
2018
pubmed:
24
12
2018
medline:
21
3
2020
entrez:
24
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We report a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n = 25), matched unrelated (n = 25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n = 10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 68 months), outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB arm versus the FT arm were as follows: PFS, 43% versus 55% (P = .28); overall survival (OS), 54% versus 70% (P = .17); relapse/progression, 36% versus 24% (P = .24); nonrelapse mortality (NRM), 21% in both arms (P = .99); and graft failure, 14% versus 10% (P = .96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P = .03). Both neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were significantly influenced by previous splenectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.51; P = .02) and splenomegaly at transplantation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.94; P = .03). In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30579966
pii: S1083-8791(18)30886-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.064
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thiotepa
905Z5W3GKH
Vidarabine
FA2DM6879K
Busulfan
G1LN9045DK
fludarabine
P2K93U8740
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
932-940Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.