Influence of Sternotomy on Delta Pulse Pressure and Delta Down During Open Chest Cardiac Surgery: A Preliminary Study.


Journal

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
ISSN: 1532-8422
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110208

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 13 09 2018
pubmed: 26 12 2018
medline: 27 5 2020
entrez: 25 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Delta pulse pressure and delta down are used as dynamic preload indicators of fluid responsiveness during closed chest surgery. There are few data regarding their accuracy in open chest surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of both delta pulse pressure and delta down. Prospective study. Single institution, nonacademic hospital. The study comprised 127 adult patients scheduled for elective open chest cardiac surgery. Delta pulse pressure and delta down were calculated for all patients before and 10 minutes after sternotomy. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of delta down and delta pulse pressure. Mann-Whitney and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a significant influence of sternotomy on delta pulse pressure values but not on delta down values. Among patients who had a positive delta down and/or delta pulse pressure before sternotomy, sternotomy significantly modified the delta pulse pressure value (p = 0.02), but not the delta down value (p = 0.22). The kappa coefficient indicated a very good agreement between delta down before and after sternotomy (0.83) and a fair agreement between delta pulse pressure before and after sternotomy (0.4). The difference between kappa coefficients was highly significant (p < 0.001). Within the study population, sternotomy significantly influenced delta pulse pressure but not delta down. In this preliminary study, delta down appeared to be more accurate to evaluate fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery than did delta pulse pressure. Before promoting delta down in current practice, confirmation is needed on a larger scale.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30581108
pii: S1053-0770(18)31026-7
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2201-2207

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Eric Deflandre (E)

Department of Anesthesia, Clinique Saint-Luc de Bouge, Namur, Belgium; Department of Ambulatory Surgery, Clinique Saint-Luc de Bouge, Namur, Belgium; University of Liege, Liege, Belgium; Medical ASTES, Jambes, Belgium. Electronic address: eric.deflandre@gmail.com.

Simon Delande (S)

Department of Anesthesia, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Jerome Cauvain (J)

Department of Anesthesia, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Pierre Geradon (P)

Department of Anesthesia, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Anne-Francoise Donneau (AF)

Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Simon Lacroix (S)

Department of Anesthesia, Clinique Saint-Luc de Bouge, Namur, Belgium.

Michel Van Dyck (M)

Department of Anesthesia, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH