Barriers to live and deceased kidney donation by patients with chronic neurological diseases: Implications for donor selection, donation timing, logistics, and regulatory compliance.

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) clinical research/practice donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors and donation: donor evaluation donors and donation: living ethics ethics and public policy kidney transplantation/nephrology law/legislation organ procurement and allocation

Journal

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
ISSN: 1600-6143
Titre abrégé: Am J Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100968638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 18 09 2018
revised: 09 12 2018
accepted: 12 12 2018
pubmed: 26 12 2018
medline: 1 9 2020
entrez: 25 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Live and deceased kidney donation by the numerous patients with advanced, progressive systemic neurological diseases, and other chronic neurological conditions (eg, high C-spine injury) remains largely unexplored. In a review of our current clinical practice, we identified multiple regulatory and clinical barriers. For live donation, mandatory reporting of postdonation donor deaths within 2 years constitutes a strong programmatic disincentive. We propose that the United Network for Organ Sharing should provide explicit regulatory guidance and reassurance for programs wishing to offer live donation to patients at higher risk of death during the reporting period. Under the proposal, live donor deaths within 30 days would still be regarded as donation-related, but later deaths would be related to the underlying disease. For deceased donation, donation after circulatory death (DCD) immediately following self-directed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment ("conscious DCD") is not universally covered by existing DCD agreements with donor hospitals. Organ procurement organizations should thus systematically strive to revise these agreements. Obtaining adequate first-person consent from these communicatively severely impaired patients may be challenging. Optimized preservation and allocation protocols may maximize utilization of these DCD kidneys. Robust public debate and action by all stakeholders is necessary to lower existing barriers and maximize donation opportunities for patients with chronic neurological conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30582272
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15230
pii: S1600-6135(22)09183-3
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2168-2173

Informations de copyright

© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Auteurs

Christoph Troppmann (C)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Chandrasekar Santhanakrishnan (C)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Junichiro Sageshima (J)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

John McVicar (J)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Richard Perez (R)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH