Clinical Relevance of Routine Monitoring of Patient-reported Outcomes

Patient-reported outcomes clinicians-reported outcomes electronic patient-reported outcomes oncology quality of life review

Journal

In vivo (Athens, Greece)
ISSN: 1791-7549
Titre abrégé: In Vivo
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 8806809

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 21 08 2018
revised: 24 09 2018
accepted: 25 09 2018
entrez: 28 12 2018
pubmed: 28 12 2018
medline: 6 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification is the standard classification used by the physicians in oncology for reporting adverse events. This classification has evolved over the last years according to the emergence of new therapies. Reporting symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and toxicities via patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice is not yet a standard of care, nevertheless many studies have been conducted recently to assess feasibility and impact of routine monitoring of PROs, which should enable for better management of toxicities and earlier detection of disease progression in a more patient-centered health care delivery system. The aim of this article was to discuss the advantages and limitations of both approaches, clinicians-reported outcomes and PROs. Growing evidence supports that the routine collection of PROs leads to improvement of QoL and overall survival of cancer patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30587597
pii: 33/1/17
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11433
pmc: PMC6364064
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

17-21

Informations de copyright

Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Références

Psychooncology. 2000 May-Jun;9(3):203-13
pubmed: 10871716
Cancer Pract. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):147-54
pubmed: 11972569
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):714-24
pubmed: 14966096
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):903-9
pubmed: 17081915
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Mar;50(5):953-62
pubmed: 24424105
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):910-5
pubmed: 25624439
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65
pubmed: 26644527
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):663-70
pubmed: 27083333
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67-73
pubmed: 27249687
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Sep 1;109(9):
pubmed: 28423407
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198
pubmed: 28586821
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142
pubmed: 28881921
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1309-1312
pubmed: 28976860
Acad Med. 1997 Sep;72(9):798-800
pubmed: 9311323

Auteurs

Frederic Fiteni (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France fredericfiteni@gmail.com.
Biometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Alice Cuenant (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France.
University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
INSERM U1194, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Mireille Favier (M)

Pharmacy Unit, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France.

Christelle Cousin (C)

Pharmacy Unit, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France.

Nadine Houede (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Nimes, Nimes, France.
University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
INSERM U1194, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH