Is release of the posterior lamella enough? A cadaveric exploration of posterior component separation techniques.

Abdominal wall reconstruction Component separation External oblique release Hernia Posterior lamella release TAR Transversus abdominis release Transversus abdominus release

Journal

American journal of surgery
ISSN: 1879-1883
Titre abrégé: Am J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 23 10 2018
revised: 05 12 2018
accepted: 10 12 2018
pubmed: 29 12 2018
medline: 24 1 2020
entrez: 29 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As posterior component separation techniques continue to gain popularity there is uncertainty regarding the degree of fascial advancement afforded by the various techniques. Our study seeks to compare the degree anterior rectus sheath translation seen in full transversus abdominus release compared to simple release of the posterior lamella of the rectus sheath. Ten hemi-abdomens in five fresh cadavers were dissected. One hemi-abdomen underwent external oblique release. The contralateral hemi-abdomen underwent retrorectus dissection and initial release of the internal lamella of the internal oblique, followed by full transversus abdominus release. A 4 kg weight was suspended from the fascia and excursion was measured after 1) external oblique separation, 2) posterior lamella of the internal oblique separation, and 3) transversus abdominis separation. Average unilateral hemifascial translation after release of the external oblique provided an average unilateral hemi-fascial translation of 3.38 cm (+/- 0.69). Release of the posterior lamella of the internal oblique provided 3.98 cm (+/- 0.94). After transversus release the average translation increased to 4.31 cm (+/- 0.89). In this cadaveric study, the majority (92%) of fascial advancement afforded by posterior component separation was achieved by an intermediate step in the transversus abdominus release operation: division of the posterior lamella of the internal oblique.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As posterior component separation techniques continue to gain popularity there is uncertainty regarding the degree of fascial advancement afforded by the various techniques. Our study seeks to compare the degree anterior rectus sheath translation seen in full transversus abdominus release compared to simple release of the posterior lamella of the rectus sheath.
METHODS
Ten hemi-abdomens in five fresh cadavers were dissected. One hemi-abdomen underwent external oblique release. The contralateral hemi-abdomen underwent retrorectus dissection and initial release of the internal lamella of the internal oblique, followed by full transversus abdominus release. A 4 kg weight was suspended from the fascia and excursion was measured after 1) external oblique separation, 2) posterior lamella of the internal oblique separation, and 3) transversus abdominis separation.
RESULTS
Average unilateral hemifascial translation after release of the external oblique provided an average unilateral hemi-fascial translation of 3.38 cm (+/- 0.69). Release of the posterior lamella of the internal oblique provided 3.98 cm (+/- 0.94). After transversus release the average translation increased to 4.31 cm (+/- 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS
In this cadaveric study, the majority (92%) of fascial advancement afforded by posterior component separation was achieved by an intermediate step in the transversus abdominus release operation: division of the posterior lamella of the internal oblique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30591182
pii: S0002-9610(18)31277-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

533-536

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

N Moores (N)

University of Utah, Division of Plastic Surgery, 30N 1900 E, #3B400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Electronic address: neal.moores@hsc.utah.edu.

H Conway (H)

Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope dr, Rm 5524.12, Salt Lake City, UT, 84123, USA. Electronic address: Hannah.conway423@gmail.com.

D Donato (D)

University of Utah, Division of Plastic Surgery, 30N 1900 E, #3B400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Electronic address: Daniel.p.donato@gmail.com.

B Gociman (B)

University of Utah, Division of Plastic Surgery, 30N 1900 E, #3B400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Electronic address: Barbu.gociman@hsc.utah.edu.

C J Pannucci (CJ)

University of Utah, Division of Plastic Surgery, 30N 1900 E, #3B400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Electronic address: Christopher.pannucci@hsc.utah.edu.

J Agarwal (J)

University of Utah, Division of Plastic Surgery, 30N 1900 E, #3B400, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Electronic address: Jay.agarwal@hsc.utah.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH