The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome mechanism of death may be a non-septic hyper-dynamic shock.


Journal

Medical hypotheses
ISSN: 1532-2777
Titre abrégé: Med Hypotheses
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 19 09 2018
revised: 15 10 2018
accepted: 20 10 2018
entrez: 30 12 2018
pubmed: 30 12 2018
medline: 7 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) mechanisms of death remains obscured. SIDS' Triple Risk Model assumed coexistence of individual subtle vulnerability, critical developmental period and stressors. Prone sleeping is a major risk factor but provide no clues regarding the mechanism of death. The leading assumed mechanisms of death are either an acute respiratory crisis or arrhythmias but neither one is supported with evidence, hence both are eventually speculations. Postmortem findings do exist but are inconclusive to identify the mechanism of death. WHAT DOES THE PROPOSED HYPOTHESIS BASED ON?: 1. The stressors (suggested by the triple risk model) share a unified compensatory physiological response of decrease in systemic vascular resistant (SVR) to facilitate a compensatory increase in cardiac output (CO). 2. The cardiovascular/cardiorespiratory control of the vulnerable infant during a critical developmental period may be impaired. 3. A severe decrease in SVR is associated with hyper-dynamic state, high output failure and distributive shock. Infant who is exposed to one or more stressors responds normally by decrease in SVR which increases CO. In normal circumstances once the needs are met both SVR and CO are stabilized on a new steady state. The incompetent cardiovascular control of the vulnerable infant fails to stabilize SVR which decreases in an uncontrolled manner. Accordingly CO increases above the needs to hyper-dynamic state, high output heart failure and hyper-dynamic shock. The proposed hypothesis provides an appropriate alternative to either respiratory crises or arrhythmia though both speculations cannot be entirely excluded.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) mechanisms of death remains obscured. SIDS' Triple Risk Model assumed coexistence of individual subtle vulnerability, critical developmental period and stressors. Prone sleeping is a major risk factor but provide no clues regarding the mechanism of death. The leading assumed mechanisms of death are either an acute respiratory crisis or arrhythmias but neither one is supported with evidence, hence both are eventually speculations. Postmortem findings do exist but are inconclusive to identify the mechanism of death. WHAT DOES THE PROPOSED HYPOTHESIS BASED ON?: 1. The stressors (suggested by the triple risk model) share a unified compensatory physiological response of decrease in systemic vascular resistant (SVR) to facilitate a compensatory increase in cardiac output (CO). 2. The cardiovascular/cardiorespiratory control of the vulnerable infant during a critical developmental period may be impaired. 3. A severe decrease in SVR is associated with hyper-dynamic state, high output failure and distributive shock.
THE HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
Infant who is exposed to one or more stressors responds normally by decrease in SVR which increases CO. In normal circumstances once the needs are met both SVR and CO are stabilized on a new steady state. The incompetent cardiovascular control of the vulnerable infant fails to stabilize SVR which decreases in an uncontrolled manner. Accordingly CO increases above the needs to hyper-dynamic state, high output heart failure and hyper-dynamic shock.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The proposed hypothesis provides an appropriate alternative to either respiratory crises or arrhythmia though both speculations cannot be entirely excluded.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30593418
pii: S0306-9877(18)30989-7
doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.10.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

35-40

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Uri Gabbay (U)

Quality Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: ugabai@post.tau.ac.il.

Doron Carmi (D)

Shoham Pediatric Clinic, Southern District, Clalit Health Services, Shoham, Israel.

Einat Birk (E)

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

David Dagan (D)

Surgeon General's Headquarters, Israel Defense Forces, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Anat Shatz (A)

ENT, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Atid, the Israeli Society for the Study and Prevention of SIDS, Jerusalem, Israel.

Debora Kidron (D)

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pathology Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH