Managing Anti-Platelet Therapy in Thrombocytopaenic Patients with Haematological Malignancy: A Multinational Clinical Vignette-Based Experiment.
Blood Platelets
/ drug effects
Cardiology
/ methods
Decision Making
Hematologic Neoplasms
/ complications
Hematology
/ methods
Hemorrhage
/ prevention & control
Humans
Israel
Italy
Myocardial Infarction
/ prevention & control
Netherlands
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Platelet Transfusion
Poisson Distribution
Random Allocation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thrombocytopenia
/ complications
Journal
Thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2567-689X
Titre abrégé: Thromb Haemost
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7608063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
entrez:
1
1
2019
pubmed:
1
1
2019
medline:
13
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on anti-platelet therapy (APT) for prevention of atherothrombotic events in thrombocytopaenic cancer patients is lacking. We aimed to identify patient and physician characteristics associated with APT management in thrombocytopaenic patients with haematological malignancy. A clinical vignette-based experiment was designed. Eleven haematologists were interviewed, identifying five variable categories. Next, 18 hypothetical vignettes were generated. Each physician received three vignettes and chose to: hold all APT; continue APT without platelet transfusion support; or continue APT with platelet transfusion support. The survey was distributed to haematologists and thrombosis specialists in three countries. Multivariate cluster robust Poisson regression models were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) of using one management option (over the other) for each variable in comparison to a reference variable. A total of 145 physicians answered 434 cases. Clinicians were more likely to hold APT in case of 20,000/µL platelets (vs. 40,000/µL; RR for continuing: 0.82 [95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.91]), recent major gastrointestinal bleeding (vs. none; RR 0.81 [0.72-0.92]) and when the physician worked at a university-affiliated community hospital (vs. non-academic community hospital; RR 0.84 [0.72-0.98]). Clinicians were more likely to continue APT in ST elevation myocardial infarction with dual APT (vs. unstable angina with single APT; RR 1.31 [1.18-1.45]) and when there were institutional protocols guiding management (vs. none; RR 1.15 [1.03-1.27]). When APT was continued, increased platelet transfusion targets were used in 34%. In summary, the decision process is complex and affected by multiple patient and physician characteristics. Platelet transfusions were frequently chosen to support APT, although no evidence supports this practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30597510
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676520
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163-174Informations de copyright
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.