Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2017
accepted:
04
12
2018
entrez:
3
1
2019
pubmed:
3
1
2019
medline:
29
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interdisciplinary scientific research teams are essential for responding to society's complex scientific and social issues. Perceptual barriers to collaboration can inhibit the productivity of teams crossing traditional disciplinary boundaries. To explore these perceptual barriers, survey measures related to perceived competence were developed and validated with a population of earth scientists (n = 449) ranging from undergraduates through professionals. Resulting competence scales included three factors that we labeled as Perceived Respect (PR), Perceived Methodological Rigor (PM), and Perceived Intelligence (Pi). A Mann-Whitney U test revealed that earth scientists perceived social science/scientists as significantly less competent than natural science/scientists. A multivariate multilevel analysis indicated that women perceived scientists as more intelligent than did men. Working with social scientists and holding an earth science PhD changed earth scientists' perceptions of social science on multiple scales. Our study indicates that competence in scientific disciplines is a multidimensional construct. Our results from earth scientists also indicate that perceptual barriers towards other scientific disciplines should be studied further as interdisciplinarity in scientific research continues to be encouraged as a solution to many socio-scientific problems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30601856
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209311
pii: PONE-D-17-36699
pmc: PMC6314610
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0209311Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:17-25
pubmed: 25500163
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83
pubmed: 17188552
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2520-31
pubmed: 18336978
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):349-61
pubmed: 14633471
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 07;5(4):e10068
pubmed: 20383332
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):202-13
pubmed: 15694529
Science. 2007 Apr 27;316(5824):548-9
pubmed: 17463273
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902
pubmed: 12051578
Nature. 1967 Feb 4;213(5075):441-3
pubmed: 6032222
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Aug;11(8):1264-75
pubmed: 16903889
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110 Suppl 1:3665-72
pubmed: 23297237
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76
pubmed: 26828106
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Mar;72(3):237-43
pubmed: 19070437