International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study.
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 01 2019
02 01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
1
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2019
medline:
4
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine patient, institution, and machine characteristics that contribute to variation in radiation doses used for computed tomography (CT). Prospective cohort study. Data were assembled and analyzed from the University of California San Francisco CT International Dose Registry. Standardized data from over 2.0 million CT examinations of adults who underwent CT between November 2015 and August 2017 from 151 institutions, across seven countries (Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, United States, Israel, and Japan). Mean effective doses and proportions of high dose examinations for abdomen, chest, combined chest and abdomen, and head CT were determined by patient characteristics (sex, age, and size), type of institution (trauma center, care provision 24 hours per day and seven days per week, academic, private), institutional practice volume, machine factors (manufacturer, model), country, and how scanners were used, before and after adjustment for patient characteristics, using hierarchical linear and logistic regression. High dose examinations were defined as CT scans with doses above the 75th percentile defined during a baseline period. The mean effective dose and proportion of high dose examinations varied substantially across institutions. The doses varied modestly (10-30%) by type of institution and machine characteristics after adjusting for patient characteristics. By contrast, even after adjusting for patient characteristics, wide variations in radiation doses across countries persisted, with a fourfold range in mean effective dose for abdomen CT examinations (7.0-25.7 mSv) and a 17-fold range in proportion of high dose examinations (4-69%). Similar variation across countries was observed for chest (mean effective dose 1.7-6.4 mSv, proportion of high dose examinations 1-26%) and combined chest and abdomen CT (10.0-37.9 mSv, 2-78%). Doses for head CT varied less (1.4-1.9 mSv, 8-27%). In multivariable models, the dose variation across countries was primarily attributable to institutional decisions regarding technical parameters (that is, how the scanners were used). CT protocols and radiation doses vary greatly across countries and are primarily attributable to local choices regarding technical parameters, rather than patient, institution, or machine characteristics. These findings suggest that the optimization of doses to a consistent standard should be possible. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03000751.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30602590
pmc: PMC6314083
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4931
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03000751']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
k4931Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA093373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181191
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the US National Institutes of Health; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the University of California Office of the President, Center for Health Quality and Innovation for the submitted work; RS-B reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the University of California Office of the President, is on a scientific advisory board, and has given talks for Bayer Healthcare; BND is on a scientific advisory board and has given talks for Bayer Healthcare; AJE has served as a consultant to GE Healthcare, and Columbia University has received support for other research from Toshiba America Medical Systems; MD reports grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, grants and personal fees from Siemens Healthcare, grants from Philips Healthcare, personal fees from Cook Medical, outside the submitted work; AS reports non-financial support and is on Bayer Healthcare scientific advisory board; JS has given talks for Bayer Healthcare; JEW reports institutional grants from Agfa, Bard, Bayer, GE, Optimed, Philips, Siemens, personal fees (speaker’s bureau) from Bayer, Siemens, outside the submitted work; DLM is on an advisory board for Hologic; the remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
BMJ. 2011 Feb 25;342:d947
pubmed: 21355025
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):120-133
pubmed: 28221093
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):445-51
pubmed: 24484064
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):208-18
pubmed: 23513245
Lancet. 2004 Jan 31;363(9406):345-51
pubmed: 15070562
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):271-278
pubmed: 24589403
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144
pubmed: 29065694
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt D):7-303
pubmed: 23189752
Radiology. 2017 Jan;282(1):182-193
pubmed: 27438166
Insights Imaging. 2013 Jun;4(3):383-90
pubmed: 23673455
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f2360
pubmed: 23694687
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(1):1-79, iii
pubmed: 18069128
BMJ. 2015 Oct 20;351:h5359
pubmed: 26487649
Health Phys. 2008 Nov;95(5):528-34
pubmed: 18849685
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f3102
pubmed: 23694689
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec;209(6):1302-1307
pubmed: 28898129
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):657-61, 657.e1
pubmed: 26116103
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):881-9
pubmed: 20308486
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):1-4
pubmed: 20573919
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86
pubmed: 20008690
BMJ. 2005 Jul 9;331(7508):77
pubmed: 15987704
Jt Comm Perspect. 2015 Feb;35(2):1, 3
pubmed: 26237988
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505
pubmed: 22681860
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Dec;142(2-4):244-54
pubmed: 20926508
Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1712-4
pubmed: 16731253
Insights Imaging. 2015 Aug;6(4):411-7
pubmed: 26014053
Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 6:F26-32
pubmed: 18376454
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):810-817
pubmed: 28395000