A three-gene methylation marker panel for the nodal metastatic risk assessment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Carboxy-Lyases
/ biosynthesis
Cell Line, Tumor
Cohort Studies
CpG Islands
DNA Methylation
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genome-Wide Association Study
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Metastasis
RNA, Messenger
/ genetics
Receptors, Kisspeptin-1
/ biosynthesis
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Septins
/ biosynthesis
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ genetics
Biomarker
Metastasis
Methylation
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
24
07
2018
accepted:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
4
1
2019
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
4
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, we aimed to identify a DNA methylation pattern suitable for prognosis assessment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and to investigate metastasis-associated processes regulated by DNA methylation. Genome-wide methylation analysis was performed on 23 muscle-invasive bladder tumors by microarray analysis. Validation was performed by the qAMP technique in two different patient cohorts (n = 32 and n = 100). mRNA expression was analyzed in 12 samples. Protein expression was determined using tissue microarrays of 291 patients. Bladder cancer cell lines T24 and 253JB-V were used for functional analyses. Microarray analyses revealed KISS1R, SEPT9 and CSAD as putative biomarkers with hypermethylation in node-positive tumors. The combination of the three genes predicted the metastatic risk with sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 71% in cohort 1, and sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 54% in cohort 2. mRNA expression differences were detected for KISS1R (p = 0.04). Protein expression of KISS1R was significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Knockdown of SEPT9v3 resulted in increased cell migration by 28% (p = 0.04) and increased invasion by 22% (p = 0.004). KISS1R overexpression resulted in decreased cell migration (25%, p = 0.1). We identified a methylation marker panel suitable to differentiate between patients with positive and negative lymph nodes at time of cystectomy. This enables a risk assessment for patients who potentially benefit from extended lymph node resection as well as from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and could improve the survival rates. Furthermore, we examined the impact of putative markers on tumor behavior. Hence, KISS1R and SEPT9 could represent a starting point for the development of novel therapy approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30603903
doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-02829-4
pii: 10.1007/s00432-018-02829-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
KISS1R protein, human
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Receptors, Kisspeptin-1
0
SEPTIN9 protein, human
EC 3.6.1.-
Septins
EC 3.6.1.-
Carboxy-Lyases
EC 4.1.1.-
sulfoalanine decarboxylase
EC 4.1.1.29
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
811-820Références
J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 3;276(31):28969-75
pubmed: 11387329
Gene. 2002 Feb 20;285(1-2):79-89
pubmed: 12039034
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jun;3(6):415-28
pubmed: 12042769
Genome Biol. 2003;4(5):P3
pubmed: 12734009
Biochem J. 1955 Mar;59(3):497-500
pubmed: 14363126
Neurochem Res. 2004 Jan;29(1):117-26
pubmed: 14992270
Urol Res. 2004 Dec;32(6):373-85
pubmed: 15551095
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Sep;90(9):5432-40
pubmed: 15998767
Nat Genet. 2005 Aug;37(8):853-62
pubmed: 16007088
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):42-7
pubmed: 16336326
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):296-304
pubmed: 16518661
J Pathol. 2006 Jul;209(3):336-43
pubmed: 16639696
Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Apr 15;16 Spec No 1:R50-9
pubmed: 17613547
Cell. 2007 Sep 7;130(5):837-50
pubmed: 17803907
Epigenetics. 2006 Jul-Sep;1(3):146-52
pubmed: 17965615
BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):15-22
pubmed: 18325050
BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):896-901
pubmed: 19522860
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec;119(3):571-8
pubmed: 20832102
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):137-43
pubmed: 21256081
Pathol Oncol Res. 2011 Sep;17(3):503-9
pubmed: 21267688
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 10;13(4):R76
pubmed: 21831286
Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):2033-8
pubmed: 23652305
Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):355-7
pubmed: 23773558
Int J Mol Med. 2013 Oct;32(4):747-54
pubmed: 23969598
Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):778-92
pubmed: 24373477
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):253-62
pubmed: 24472711
Nat Cell Biol. 2014 Aug;16(8):717-27
pubmed: 25082194
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):727-8
pubmed: 26181353
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174039
pubmed: 28319171