Technical and Imaging Outcomes from the UK Registry of Prostate Artery Embolization (UK-ROPE) Study: Focusing on Predictors of Clinical Success.


Journal

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 27 08 2018
accepted: 21 12 2018
pubmed: 4 1 2019
medline: 6 6 2019
entrez: 4 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The UK Registry of Prostate Artery Embolization (UK-ROPE) was a prospective, multicentre study comparing PAE against surgical therapies for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A wealth of data was collected supplementary to the main study outcomes which provide a snapshot of UK PAE practice. We aimed to interpret these data in the hope of providing insight into factors which affect clinical outcome and radiation dose. 216 patients (mean age 66, mean IPSS 21.3) undergoing PAE at 20 British centres from July 2014 to January 2016 were prospectively followed up to 12 months with retrospective analysis of the data. Technical outcome was evaluated based on procedural and fluoroscopy times, skin dose and dose area product (DAP). Clinical outcome was evaluated through collection of Qmax, IPSS reduction and prostate volume reduction. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess the significance of various patients and procedural factors on clinical outcome and patient dose. Significant predictors of technical outcome which affected patient skin dose included severity of CTA-detected atheroma (p < 0.001), the practitioner (p < 0.001) and use of protective coil embolization (p = 0.019). Predictors of clinical outcome included initial prostate size (dichotomized into groups > 80 ml and = <80 ml, d = 1, p = 0.0138), embolic agent (spherical particles < 300 nm performed best, p = 0.01) and number of arteries embolized (IPSS reduction of 32.9% in unilateral PAE versus 54.4% for bilateral PAE, p = 0.026). We have identified several important factors which are associated with improved clinical outcome and increased patient dose which we hope will facilitate optimal patient selection and encourage improved embolization technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30603967
doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-02156-8
pii: 10.1007/s00270-018-02156-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

666-676

Subventions

Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
ID : n/a
Organisme : Cook Medical
ID : n/a

Auteurs

Nigel Hacking (N)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Ganesh Vigneswaran (G)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Drew Maclean (D)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. dfwmaclean@doctors.org.uk.

Sachin Modi (S)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Jonathan Dyer (J)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Mark Harris (M)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Timothy Bryant (T)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH