Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
Adult
Aged
Esthetics
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nasal Obstruction
/ surgery
Nasal Septum
/ surgery
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Radiofrequency Ablation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Rhinoplasty
/ methods
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Turbinates
/ surgery
Young Adult
NOSE scale
PROMs
ROE questionnaire
Septorhinoplasty
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
20
09
2018
accepted:
24
12
2018
pubmed:
4
1
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
entrez:
4
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty (SRP) are often not clearly demonstrated. There is still an open topic in the literature about analysis of aesthetic, functional results and patients' satisfaction after SRP. The aim of our study is to determine patients' satisfaction after SRP and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate (RF) regarding nose appearance and improvement of symptoms, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). ROE questionnaire and the NOSE scale were used for a retrospective evaluation to assess patient's satisfaction in 369 patients undergoing SRP surgery from 2003 to 2016. Two additional questions were asked to confirm satisfaction following surgery. 258 patients completed the questionnaires (71.7%). The global average ROE score was 18.14 (75.6%). The percentage of satisfaction of aesthetic result was 87.3%, in particular 10.5% were very happy, 57% very much satisfied and 19.8% moderately satisfied. The global post-operative average NOSE score was 13.1 with the resolution of nasal obstruction in 72.1% cases and a marked improvement in 9.3%. The results of the two additional questions showed that 81% of patients would undergo the procedure again if required and 72.1% of patients were globally satisfied. Our study demonstrates the utility of PROMs in evaluating aesthetic and functional results after SRP and simultaneous RF. In our series, the patients undergoing SRP and RF are generally satisfied by the functional and aesthetic results. This kind of assessments should be the most common post-operative evaluation methods in this surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30604059
doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-05269-5
pii: 10.1007/s00405-018-05269-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
745-751Références
Head Neck. 1999 Jul;21(4):319-24
pubmed: 10376751
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jun;108(6):569-75
pubmed: 10378525
Am J Rhinol. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(1):51-5
pubmed: 10711333
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):192-7
pubmed: 10890946
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000 Dec;25(6):499-503
pubmed: 11122288
Am J Rhinol. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(2):127-33
pubmed: 11345152
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001 Jul-Sep;3(3):198-201
pubmed: 11497506
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):263-7
pubmed: 12232472
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):157-63
pubmed: 14990910
Allergy. 2005 Jun;60(6):795-800
pubmed: 15876310
Rhinology. 2005 Sep;43(3):169-79
pubmed: 16218509
Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):605-10
pubmed: 18176341
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec;34(6):518-25
pubmed: 20070760
Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb;122(2):254-9
pubmed: 22252921
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul-Aug;78(4):76-9
pubmed: 22936141
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Jun;33(3):146-53
pubmed: 23853409
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Jan;97(1):63-5
pubmed: 25519270
J Laryngol Otol. 1989 Oct;103(10):909-11
pubmed: 2584850
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;40(6):698-703
pubmed: 25943502
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):420-4
pubmed: 26967078
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3):419e-29e
pubmed: 27556616
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1807-1811
pubmed: 27798735
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;47(2):175-179
pubmed: 28967532
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1635-1647
pubmed: 30019242
Ann Plast Surg. 1986 Dec;17(6):513-20
pubmed: 3827121
Rhinology. 1984 Sep;22(3):157-64
pubmed: 6209772
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Jul;121(7):729-36
pubmed: 7598848
Head Neck. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):485-96
pubmed: 8253555
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1995 Sep-Oct;57(5):260-3
pubmed: 8587778
Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998 Jan;25(1):45-8
pubmed: 9512794