Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
1
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2019
medline:
15
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mosquito-borne viruses-such as Zika, chikungunya, dengue fever, and yellow fever, among others-are of global importance. Although vaccine development for prevention of mosquito-borne arbovirus infections has been a focus, mitigation strategies continue to rely on vector control. However, vector control has failed to prevent recent epidemics and arrest expanding geographic distribution of key arboviruses, such as dengue. As a consequence, there has been increasing necessity to further optimize current strategies within integrated approaches and advance development of alternative, innovative strategies for the control of mosquito-borne arboviruses. This review, intended as a general overview, is one of a series being generated by the Worldwide Insecticide resistance Network (WIN). The alternative strategies discussed reflect those that are currently under evaluation for public health value by the World Health Organization (WHO) and represent strategies of focus by globally recognized public health stakeholders as potential insecticide resistance (IR)-mitigating strategies. Conditions where these alternative strategies could offer greatest public health value in consideration of mitigating IR will be dependent on the anticipated mechanism of action. Arguably, the most pressing need for endorsement of the strategies described here will be the epidemiological evidence of a public health impact. As the burden of mosquito-borne arboviruses, predominately those transmitted by Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus, continues to grow at a global scale, new vector-control tools and integrated strategies will be required to meet public health demands. Decisions regarding implementation of alternative strategies will depend on key ecoepidemiological parameters that each is intended to optimally impact toward driving down arbovirus transmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Mosquito-borne viruses-such as Zika, chikungunya, dengue fever, and yellow fever, among others-are of global importance. Although vaccine development for prevention of mosquito-borne arbovirus infections has been a focus, mitigation strategies continue to rely on vector control. However, vector control has failed to prevent recent epidemics and arrest expanding geographic distribution of key arboviruses, such as dengue. As a consequence, there has been increasing necessity to further optimize current strategies within integrated approaches and advance development of alternative, innovative strategies for the control of mosquito-borne arboviruses.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
This review, intended as a general overview, is one of a series being generated by the Worldwide Insecticide resistance Network (WIN). The alternative strategies discussed reflect those that are currently under evaluation for public health value by the World Health Organization (WHO) and represent strategies of focus by globally recognized public health stakeholders as potential insecticide resistance (IR)-mitigating strategies. Conditions where these alternative strategies could offer greatest public health value in consideration of mitigating IR will be dependent on the anticipated mechanism of action. Arguably, the most pressing need for endorsement of the strategies described here will be the epidemiological evidence of a public health impact.
CONCLUSIONS
As the burden of mosquito-borne arboviruses, predominately those transmitted by Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus, continues to grow at a global scale, new vector-control tools and integrated strategies will be required to meet public health demands. Decisions regarding implementation of alternative strategies will depend on key ecoepidemiological parameters that each is intended to optimally impact toward driving down arbovirus transmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30605475
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006822
pii: PNTD-D-18-00103
pmc: PMC6317787
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Control Agents
0
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0006822Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Parasit Vectors. 2013 Sep 11;6(1):262
pubmed: 24025232
Science. 2016 Aug 5;353(6299):aaf5573
pubmed: 27256883
Cell Host Microbe. 2016 Jun 8;19(6):771-4
pubmed: 27156023
J Med Entomol. 2017 Mar 1;54(2):387-395
pubmed: 28031347
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Sep 11;8(9):e3115
pubmed: 25211492
Genetics. 2017 Feb;205(2):827-841
pubmed: 27941126
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994 Sep;10(3):344-7
pubmed: 7807075
Med Vet Entomol. 2005 Dec;19(4):413-22
pubmed: 16336306
Theor Popul Biol. 2016 Apr;108:51-69
pubmed: 26704073
Malar J. 2010 Aug 20;9:239
pubmed: 20727149
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 19;11(1):e0005197
pubmed: 28103255
J Med Entomol. 1974 Jul 15;11(3):331-41
pubmed: 4152968
J Econ Entomol. 2003 Oct;96(5):1559-62
pubmed: 14650531
J Vector Ecol. 2011 Jun;36(1):59-67
pubmed: 21635642
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 18;10(7):e0004850
pubmed: 27428011
Med Vet Entomol. 1990 Jul;4(3):283-8
pubmed: 2132993
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Oct 06;9(10):e0004109
pubmed: 26440967
J Med Entomol. 2017 Nov 7;54(6):1649-1658
pubmed: 28981684
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Feb 12;8:96
pubmed: 25880645
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999 Sep;15(3):276-82
pubmed: 10480115
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Dec;93(6):1330-1337
pubmed: 26503276
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1793
pubmed: 22953015
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Dec;91(6):1269-1276
pubmed: 25223937
EMBO Rep. 2011 Jun;12(6):508-18
pubmed: 21546911
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jun 26;8:348
pubmed: 26112698
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 01;11(3):e0149738
pubmed: 26930058
Malar J. 2010 Jul 21;9:210
pubmed: 20663142
Med Vet Entomol. 2014 Aug;28 Suppl 1:14-25
pubmed: 24912919
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jun;104(6):379-86
pubmed: 20400169
Malar J. 2014 May 31;13:208
pubmed: 24885993
Nature. 1971 Aug 27;232(5313):657-8
pubmed: 4937405
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jan 15;9(1):e0003406
pubmed: 25590626
Am J Hyg. 1962 Jul;76:61-81
pubmed: 13916153
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 20;11(7):e0005625
pubmed: 28727779
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 May 07;9(5):e0003655
pubmed: 25951103
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 10;14(4):
pubmed: 28394284
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 May 13;65(18):479-80
pubmed: 27171600
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0152805
pubmed: 27187593
Parasit Vectors. 2013 Jan 11;6:6
pubmed: 23312018
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2016 Sep;32(3):194-202
pubmed: 27802398
Trends Parasitol. 2016 Mar;32(3):207-218
pubmed: 26776329
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 16;9(4):e0003726
pubmed: 25879206
J Med Entomol. 2013 Mar;50(2):317-25
pubmed: 23540120
Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S6
pubmed: 19917076
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0160386
pubmed: 27532497
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1760
pubmed: 22880140
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Apr;62(5-6):2086-95
pubmed: 22269900
Malar J. 2012 Feb 01;11:31
pubmed: 22297155
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Dec;91(6):1079-87
pubmed: 25311699
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Sep;22(3):497-500
pubmed: 17067052
Parasitol Res. 2014 Jan;113(1):73-9
pubmed: 24122115
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):E6736-43
pubmed: 26598698
Cell. 2009 Dec 24;139(7):1268-78
pubmed: 20064373
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3199-204
pubmed: 15933022
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May;8(5):1402-19
pubmed: 21655127
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 7;270(1518):921-8
pubmed: 12803906
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Dec 28;5:300
pubmed: 23273133
Malar J. 2012 May 14;11:164
pubmed: 22583679
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;476(7361):454-7
pubmed: 21866160
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jul 02;9(7):e0003864
pubmed: 26135160
Glob Health Action. 2013 Mar 28;6:20473
pubmed: 23541045
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1797
pubmed: 23166845
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 1;10(12):e0005054
pubmed: 27906961
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Mar;72(3):618-28
pubmed: 26374668
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;34(1):78-83
pubmed: 26641531
Trends Parasitol. 2014 Jun;30(6):271-3
pubmed: 24746400
Genetics. 2017 Apr;205(4):1587-1596
pubmed: 28159753
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 29;14(2):
pubmed: 28146066
Parasitol Res. 2016 Apr;115(4):1573-82
pubmed: 26738734
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jan 23;8:42
pubmed: 25614052
BMC Biol. 2007 Mar 20;5:11
pubmed: 17374148
J Med Entomol. 2014 Mar;51(2):408-20
pubmed: 24724291
Science. 2015 Apr 24;348(6233):442-4
pubmed: 25908821
J Vis Exp. 2014 Jan 04;(83):e3579
pubmed: 24430003
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 23;6:33846
pubmed: 27659038
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008 Sep;24(3):415-8
pubmed: 18939695
Malar J. 2008 Dec 11;7 Suppl 1:S4
pubmed: 19091038
Annu Rev Entomol. 1969;14:81-102
pubmed: 4882184
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Feb;84(2):208-17
pubmed: 21292886
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1997 Jun;13(2):140-4
pubmed: 9249650
Parasitol Res. 2013 Apr;112(4):1583-7
pubmed: 23388730
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 07;9(4):e0003702
pubmed: 25849040
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;476(7361):450-3
pubmed: 21866159
Pathog Glob Health. 2013 Jun;107(4):170-9
pubmed: 23816508
J Med Entomol. 2008 May;45(3):384-90
pubmed: 18533430
J Insect Sci. 2004;4:19
pubmed: 15861235
Parasitol Res. 2017 Feb;116(2):677-684
pubmed: 27942961
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2016 Dec;32(4):341-344
pubmed: 28206869
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 08;2(8):e716
pubmed: 17684562
Med Vet Entomol. 2015 Mar;29(1):37-43
pubmed: 25429906
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):11530-4
pubmed: 19561295
Sci Adv. 2017 Feb 17;3(2):e1602024
pubmed: 28232955