Disabled insecticidal proteins: A novel tool to understand differences in insect receptor utilization.


Journal

Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
ISSN: 1879-0240
Titre abrégé: Insect Biochem Mol Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207282

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 12 10 2018
revised: 08 12 2018
accepted: 14 12 2018
pubmed: 4 1 2019
medline: 7 9 2019
entrez: 4 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The development of insect resistance to pesticides via natural selection is an acknowledged agricultural issue. Likewise, resistance development in target insect populations is a significant challenge to the durability of crop traits conferring insect protection and has driven the need for novel insecticidal proteins (IPs) with alternative mechanism of action (MOA) mediated by different insect receptors. The combination or "stacking" of transgenes encoding different insecticidal proteins in a single crop plant can greatly delay the development of insect resistance, but requires sufficient knowledge of MOA to identify proteins with different receptor preferences. Accordingly, a rapid technique for differentiating the receptor binding preferences of insecticidal proteins is a critical need. This article introduces the Disabled Insecticidal Protein (DIP) method as applied to the well-known family of three-domain insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and related bacteria. These DIP's contain amino acid substitutions in domain 1 that render the proteins non-toxic but still capable of competing with active proteins in insect feeding assays, resulting in a suppression of the expected insecticidal activity. A set of insecticidal proteins with known differences in receptor binding (Cry1Ab3, Cry1Ac.107, Cry2Ab2, Cry1Ca, Cry1A.105, and Cry1A.1088) has been studied using the DIP method, yielding results that are consistent with previous MOA studies. When a native IP and an excess of DIP are co-administered to insects in a feeding assay, the outcome depends on the overlap between their MOAs: if receptors are shared, then the DIP saturates the receptors to which the native protein would ordinarily bind, and acts as an antidote whereas, if there is no shared receptor, the toxicity of the native insecticidal protein is not inhibited. These results suggest that the DIP methodology, employing standard insect feeding assays, is a robust and effective method for rapid MOA differentiation among insecticidal proteins.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30605769
pii: S0965-1748(18)30367-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.12.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins 0
Bacterial Proteins 0
Endotoxins 0
Hemolysin Proteins 0
insecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus Thuringiensis 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

79-88

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Bayer Crop Science. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Agoston Jerga (A)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA. Electronic address: agoston.jerga@bayer.com.

Artem G Evdokimov (AG)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Farhad Moshiri (F)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Jeffrey A Haas (JA)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Mao Chen (M)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

William Clinton (W)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Xiaoran Fu (X)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Coralie Halls (C)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Nuria Jimenez-Juarez (N)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Crystal N Kretzler (CN)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Timothy D Panosian (TD)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Michael Pleau (M)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

James K Roberts (JK)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Timothy J Rydel (TJ)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Sara Salvador (S)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Reuben Sequeira (R)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Yanfei Wang (Y)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Meiying Zheng (M)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

James A Baum (JA)

Plant Biotechnology, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH