Disabled insecticidal proteins: A novel tool to understand differences in insect receptor utilization.
Bacillus thuringiensis
Insect resistance
Insecticidal protein
Mechanism of action
Journal
Insect biochemistry and molecular biology
ISSN: 1879-0240
Titre abrégé: Insect Biochem Mol Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207282
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2018
revised:
08
12
2018
accepted:
14
12
2018
pubmed:
4
1
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
entrez:
4
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The development of insect resistance to pesticides via natural selection is an acknowledged agricultural issue. Likewise, resistance development in target insect populations is a significant challenge to the durability of crop traits conferring insect protection and has driven the need for novel insecticidal proteins (IPs) with alternative mechanism of action (MOA) mediated by different insect receptors. The combination or "stacking" of transgenes encoding different insecticidal proteins in a single crop plant can greatly delay the development of insect resistance, but requires sufficient knowledge of MOA to identify proteins with different receptor preferences. Accordingly, a rapid technique for differentiating the receptor binding preferences of insecticidal proteins is a critical need. This article introduces the Disabled Insecticidal Protein (DIP) method as applied to the well-known family of three-domain insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and related bacteria. These DIP's contain amino acid substitutions in domain 1 that render the proteins non-toxic but still capable of competing with active proteins in insect feeding assays, resulting in a suppression of the expected insecticidal activity. A set of insecticidal proteins with known differences in receptor binding (Cry1Ab3, Cry1Ac.107, Cry2Ab2, Cry1Ca, Cry1A.105, and Cry1A.1088) has been studied using the DIP method, yielding results that are consistent with previous MOA studies. When a native IP and an excess of DIP are co-administered to insects in a feeding assay, the outcome depends on the overlap between their MOAs: if receptors are shared, then the DIP saturates the receptors to which the native protein would ordinarily bind, and acts as an antidote whereas, if there is no shared receptor, the toxicity of the native insecticidal protein is not inhibited. These results suggest that the DIP methodology, employing standard insect feeding assays, is a robust and effective method for rapid MOA differentiation among insecticidal proteins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30605769
pii: S0965-1748(18)30367-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.12.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins
0
Bacterial Proteins
0
Endotoxins
0
Hemolysin Proteins
0
insecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus Thuringiensis
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
79-88Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Bayer Crop Science. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.