TOPAS-nBio: An Extension to the TOPAS Simulation Toolkit for Cellular and Sub-cellular Radiobiology.
Journal
Radiation research
ISSN: 1938-5404
Titre abrégé: Radiat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
1
2019
medline:
6
4
2019
entrez:
5
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The TOPAS Monte Carlo (MC) system is used in radiation therapy and medical imaging research, having played a significant role in making Monte Carlo simulations widely available for proton therapy related research. While TOPAS provides detailed simulations of patient scale properties, the fundamental unit of the biological response to radiation is a cell. Thus, our goal was to develop TOPAS-nBio, an extension of TOPAS dedicated to advance understanding of radiobiological effects at the (sub-)cellular, (i.e., the cellular and sub-cellular) scale. TOPAS-nBio was designed as a set of open source classes that extends TOPAS to model radiobiological experiments. TOPAS-nBio is based on and extends Geant4-DNA, which extends the Geant4 toolkit, the basis of TOPAS, to include very low-energy interactions of particles down to vibrational energies, explicitly simulates every particle interaction (i.e., without using condensed histories) and propagates radiolysis products. To further facilitate the use of TOPAS-nBio, a graphical user interface was developed. TOPAS-nBio offers full track-structure Monte Carlo simulations, integration of chemical reactions within the first millisecond, an extensive catalogue of specialized cell geometries as well as sub-cellular structures such as DNA and mitochondria, and interfaces to mechanistic models of DNA repair kinetics. We compared TOPAS-nBio simulations to measured and published data of energy deposition patterns and chemical reaction rates (G values). Our simulations agreed well within the experimental uncertainties. Additionally, we expanded the chemical reactions and species provided in Geant4-DNA and developed a new method based on independent reaction times (IRT), including a total of 72 reactions classified into 6 types between neutral and charged species. Chemical stage simulations using IRT were a factor of 145 faster than with step-by-step tracking. Finally, we applied the geometric/chemical modeling to obtain initial yields of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA fibers for proton irradiations of 3 and 50 MeV and compared the effect of including chemical reactions on the number and complexity of DSB induction. Over half of the DSBs were found to include chemical reactions with approximately 5% of DSBs caused only by chemical reactions. In conclusion, the TOPAS-nBio extension to the TOPAS MC application offers access to accurate and detailed multiscale simulations, from a macroscopic description of the radiation field to microscopic description of biological outcome for selected cells. TOPAS-nBio offers detailed physics and chemistry simulations of radiobiological experiments on cells simulating the initially induced damage and links to models of DNA repair kinetics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30609382
pii: 10.1667/RR15226.1
doi: 10.1667/RR15226.1
pmc: PMC6377808
mid: NIHMS1011340
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
125-138Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA187003
Pays : United States
Références
J Phys Chem A. 2011 Nov 10;115(44):12212-6
pubmed: 21970432
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):352-4
pubmed: 21981874
DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Dec 10;9(12):1273-82
pubmed: 21036673
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Mar;101(3):265-70
pubmed: 21232812
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 7;57(11):3281-93
pubmed: 22572154
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45161
pubmed: 28345622
Int J Radiat Biol. 1989 Jul;56(1):1-19
pubmed: 2569005
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121719
pubmed: 24320505
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Sep 06;63(17):175018
pubmed: 30088810
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jan 7;57(1):209-24
pubmed: 22156022
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 7;7(1):10790
pubmed: 28883414
Med Phys. 1995 May;22(5):503-24
pubmed: 7643786
Appl Radiat Isot. 2014 Jan;83 Pt B:137-41
pubmed: 23478094
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3870-6
pubmed: 26133588
Radiat Res. 2000 Feb;153(2):196-200
pubmed: 10629619
J Theor Biol. 2006 Sep 7;242(1):62-8
pubmed: 16580022
Med Phys. 2018 May;45(5):2230-2242
pubmed: 29480947
Radiat Res. 2017 Dec;188(6):690-703
pubmed: 28792846
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041718
pubmed: 23556888
J Phys Chem. 1969 Jun;73(6):2056-8
pubmed: 5789935
Med Phys. 2004 Oct;31(10):2883-98
pubmed: 15543798
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 17;63(10):105014
pubmed: 29697057
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901835
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):861-874
pubmed: 26653251
Med Phys. 2012 Nov;39(11):6818-37
pubmed: 23127075
J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 29;27(35):9247-51
pubmed: 17728438
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2654
pubmed: 29422642
Med Phys. 2017 May;44(5):2002-2010
pubmed: 28273349
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 7;57(11):3295-308
pubmed: 22572201
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11923
pubmed: 28931851
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Nov 7;60(21):8583-99
pubmed: 26501434
Phys Med. 2016 Dec;32(12):1833-1840
pubmed: 27773539
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 14;6:33290
pubmed: 27624453
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015 Aug;54(3):343-52
pubmed: 26007308
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):3237-3249
pubmed: 28350546
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 06;62(15):5908-5925
pubmed: 28594336
Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5451-66
pubmed: 20095258
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4692-708
pubmed: 20964188
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 07;60(13):5037-52
pubmed: 26061583
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 07;60(13):5053-70
pubmed: 26061666
Radiat Res. 2019 Jan;191(1):76-92
pubmed: 30407901
Radiat Res. 1977 Apr;70(1):91-106
pubmed: 850737
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2009 Feb;48(1):11-20
pubmed: 18949480
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1988 Mar;53(3):353-65
pubmed: 3257951
Radiat Res. 1961 Jun;14:689-704
pubmed: 13683173
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):318-24
pubmed: 16552417
Phys Med. 2017 Jan;33:207-215
pubmed: 28017738