Bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and macular grid photocoagulation for macular edema in eyes with non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion: results from a prospective randomized study.


Journal

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 05 06 2018
accepted: 18 12 2018
revised: 18 12 2018
pubmed: 6 1 2019
medline: 2 5 2019
entrez: 6 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The objective of the study was the investigation of the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (BEV) with or without additional macular grid laser photocoagulation (GRID) for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Prospective, randomized, monocentric study. Thirty-two patients were included. Initially, all eyes in both groups received three monthly injections of BEV, followed by additional injections if re-treatment criteria were met. In the BEV + GRID group, photocoagulation was performed 2 weeks after the first BEV injection and laser re-treatment was allowed. The follow-up was 38 weeks. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Changes of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and of retinal ischemia, as well as the number of injections were also evaluated. Sixteen eyes were randomized into each group. At baseline, BCVA was similar in both groups (BEV + GRID: 20/71; BEV: 20/60; P = 0.51). At 38 weeks, BCVA significantly improved in the two groups (BEV + GRID gain of 9 ± 11.2 letters and 16.25 ± 10.08 letters in the BEV) with no difference between them (P < 0.06). With regard to anatomical findings, initial CRT in BEV + GRID was 496.2 μm ± 138.4 μm and 538.9 μm ± 156.9 μm in BEV (P < 0.1697). At 38 weeks, CRT decreased in both groups significantly, 98.2 μm in the BEV + GRID (P = 0.02) and 141.7 μm in the BEV group (P = 0.01), with no significant difference between groups (P < 0.17). The area of FAZ a significantly increased in both groups (41% (P = 0.04) in BEV + GRID; 35% (P = 0.03) in BEV) during the study and the grade of peripheral ischemia remained unchanged. The mean number of injections was 3.8 (range 3-6) with no significant difference between groups. Our data demonstrate a beneficial effect of bevacizumab in ME in eyes with BRVO. A loading phase of three injections led to a significant improvement in vision in both groups, which persisted at week 38. Additional grid laser photocoagulation exhibited no beneficial functional or anatomical effect during the study, nor did it reduce the number of injections. The FAZ area increased significantly in both groups, but overall retinal ischemia did not. Further studies investigating more numerous eyes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The objective of the study was the investigation of the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (BEV) with or without additional macular grid laser photocoagulation (GRID) for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS METHODS
Prospective, randomized, monocentric study. Thirty-two patients were included. Initially, all eyes in both groups received three monthly injections of BEV, followed by additional injections if re-treatment criteria were met. In the BEV + GRID group, photocoagulation was performed 2 weeks after the first BEV injection and laser re-treatment was allowed. The follow-up was 38 weeks. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Changes of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and of retinal ischemia, as well as the number of injections were also evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixteen eyes were randomized into each group. At baseline, BCVA was similar in both groups (BEV + GRID: 20/71; BEV: 20/60; P = 0.51). At 38 weeks, BCVA significantly improved in the two groups (BEV + GRID gain of 9 ± 11.2 letters and 16.25 ± 10.08 letters in the BEV) with no difference between them (P < 0.06). With regard to anatomical findings, initial CRT in BEV + GRID was 496.2 μm ± 138.4 μm and 538.9 μm ± 156.9 μm in BEV (P < 0.1697). At 38 weeks, CRT decreased in both groups significantly, 98.2 μm in the BEV + GRID (P = 0.02) and 141.7 μm in the BEV group (P = 0.01), with no significant difference between groups (P < 0.17). The area of FAZ a significantly increased in both groups (41% (P = 0.04) in BEV + GRID; 35% (P = 0.03) in BEV) during the study and the grade of peripheral ischemia remained unchanged. The mean number of injections was 3.8 (range 3-6) with no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our data demonstrate a beneficial effect of bevacizumab in ME in eyes with BRVO. A loading phase of three injections led to a significant improvement in vision in both groups, which persisted at week 38. Additional grid laser photocoagulation exhibited no beneficial functional or anatomical effect during the study, nor did it reduce the number of injections. The FAZ area increased significantly in both groups, but overall retinal ischemia did not. Further studies investigating more numerous eyes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30610424
doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04223-9
pii: 10.1007/s00417-018-04223-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

913-920

Références

Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:173-8
pubmed: 23355773
Ophthalmologica. 2015;234(1):6-25
pubmed: 26088287
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 25;8(10):e78538
pubmed: 24205253
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):761-70
pubmed: 24585424
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):434-9
pubmed: 21140369
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1426-37
pubmed: 25972260
Retina. 2016 Mar;36(3):432-48
pubmed: 26716954
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;98(2):195-9
pubmed: 24215032
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;93(1):e29-37
pubmed: 25042729
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;247(1):27-33
pubmed: 18696094
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10S):S78-S88
pubmed: 27664289
Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):271-82
pubmed: 6383055
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;250(6):787-93
pubmed: 22539192
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):601-6
pubmed: 17306753
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):964-70
pubmed: 19410954
Retina. 2017 Sep;37(9):1700-1709
pubmed: 27828907
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;31(3):179-85
pubmed: 25715024
Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan;104(1):34-41
pubmed: 2417579
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1094-1101.e5
pubmed: 20430447
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Feb;85(1):118-9
pubmed: 17244225
Retina. 2013 May;33(5):901-10
pubmed: 23609064
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct-Dec;21(4):296-301
pubmed: 25371633
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 11;(5):CD008732
pubmed: 25961835
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1778-1787
pubmed: 28807635
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):330-336
pubmed: 26522708
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 06;55(3):1370-7
pubmed: 24526445
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(4):607-14
pubmed: 22101497
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1332-44
pubmed: 27039022
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1102-1112.e1
pubmed: 20398941
Retina. 2007 Apr-May;27(4):419-25
pubmed: 17420692

Auteurs

Josep Callizo (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. josep.callizo@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Abed Atili (A)

Augen Praxis Klinik Esslingen, Adler-Str6, 73728, Esslingen, Germany.

Nina Antonia Striebe (NA)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Sebastian Bemme (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Nicolas Feltgen (N)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Hans Hoerauf (H)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Thomas Bertelmann (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH