Health-related quality of life in patients treated with eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: Pooled analysis from two registered clinical trials.
Adult
Anticonvulsants
/ therapeutic use
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
/ methods
Dibenzazepines
/ therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Epilepsy
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
/ methods
Quality of Life
/ psychology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Antiepileptic drug treatment
Eslicarbazepine acetate
Health-related quality of life
Monotherapy
Partial-onset seizures
Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31)
Journal
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
05
11
2018
revised:
06
12
2018
accepted:
06
12
2018
pubmed:
6
1
2019
medline:
26
5
2020
entrez:
6
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment effectiveness is traditionally assessed based on seizure frequency reduction (SFR), the overall value of AEDs in managing epilepsy and associated sequelae may be best assessed by how patients feel and function in terms of overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We conducted a pooled analysis of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) questionnaire from two phase 3 trials to explore the effect of response to conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy on HRQoL. Data were pooled from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, historical control phase 3 trials examining conversion to ESL monotherapy in adults with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures (POS). The relationship between HRQoL and ESL treatment response was examined through the analysis of week 18 QOLIE-31 scores between patients who met the SFR ≥50% threshold (responders) and patients with SFR <50% (nonresponders). The analysis was conducted in the efficacy population (intent-to-treat (ITT) patients who entered the AED taper/conversion period) and completer population (efficacy patients who completed the ESL monotherapy period) and was repeated using an SFR ≥75% threshold. In the efficacy population, week 18 QOLIE-31 total score least squares mean (LSM) was significantly higher for responders with ≥50% SFR (LSM difference: 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-5.8; p = 0.037) and with ≥75% SFR (LSM difference: 7.0; 95% CI: 3.6-10.3; p < 0.001) than nonresponders. In the completer population, overall quality of life (QoL) (LSM difference: 5.1; 95% CI: 1.5-8.6; p = 0.006) and social functioning (LSM difference: 5.4; 95% CI: 0.1-10.7; p = 0.046) were significantly higher for responders with ≥50% SFR than nonresponders, and all domain LSMs were higher for responders with ≥75% SFR (all p < 0.05) than nonresponders. This analysis of data from the phase 3 trials demonstrated significantly higher HRQoL among ESL responders with SFR of ≥75% and also at the lower SFR threshold of ≥50% compared with nonresponders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30611005
pii: S1525-5050(18)30891-6
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.12.003
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticonvulsants
0
Dibenzazepines
0
eslicarbazepine acetate
BEA68ZVB2K
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31-35Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.