Hydatidiform molar pregnancy following assisted reproduction.
Adult
Chorionic Villi
/ physiopathology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ adverse effects
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
/ epidemiology
Humans
Hydatidiform Mole
/ epidemiology
Male
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
/ adverse effects
Triploidy
ART
HFEA
HM
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
03
10
2018
accepted:
14
12
2018
pubmed:
7
1
2019
medline:
28
8
2019
entrez:
7
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) is increasing; however, reports of molar pregnancy following ART remain scarce. Currently, the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA) collates data on the molar pregnancies that have resulted through the use of ART. Recently, they have indicated that they will no longer collect these data. This paper aimed to examine the incidence of molar pregnancy amongst patients undergoing assisted reproduction. We contacted HFEA and placed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (2000) for the number of molar pregnancies that resulted from fresh/frozen embryo transfer since HFEA started collecting data in 1991 to February 2018. We also asked how many patients who had suffered a molar pregnancy went on to have a normal pregnancy and how many had subsequent molar pregnancies, in subsequent treatment cycles. Between 68 and 76 molar pregnancies occurred within this period using ART (n = 274,655). The incidence of molar pregnancy using fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (1/4302) and fresh in vitro fertilisation (IVF) (1/4333) was similar. The risk of recurrence of molar pregnancy following a previous molar was higher following ART compared to spontaneous conceptions. The use of ICSI should be protective against triploidy; however, the retrospective data suggests that molar pregnancy is not eliminated with the use of ART. It is pertinent to continue to record this data, through the gestational trophoblastic disease centres, in order to ensure no further increase in incidence, appropriate follow-up, and transparency in communication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30612209
doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1389-9
pii: 10.1007/s10815-018-1389-9
pmc: PMC6504995
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
667-671Références
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jun;66(6):1807-20
pubmed: 10801385
Fertil Steril. 2000 Oct;74(4):828-9
pubmed: 11020533
Hum Reprod. 2001 Jan;16(1):115-120
pubmed: 11139548
Hum Reprod. 2002 Jan;17(1):5-7
pubmed: 11756352
Hum Reprod. 2003 Feb;18(2):236-42
pubmed: 12571155
Placenta. 2003 Aug;24(7):797-9
pubmed: 12852872
Hum Reprod. 2003 Oct;18(10):2118-21
pubmed: 14507831
Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):365-7
pubmed: 14747182
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):384-90
pubmed: 16595215
Clin Genet. 2007 Jan;71(1):25-34
pubmed: 17204043
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):49-55
pubmed: 17953968
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1639-45
pubmed: 19369669
Lancet. 1990 Apr 28;335(8696):1030-1
pubmed: 1970075
Cancer Genet. 2012 Mar;205(3):63-77
pubmed: 22469506
Int J Mol Med. 2016 Oct;38(4):979-86
pubmed: 27599669
Fertil Steril. 1995 Dec;64(6):1130-5
pubmed: 7589665
J Reprod Med. 1994 Mar;39(3):228-32
pubmed: 8035378
Hum Reprod. 1997 Apr;12(4):805-8
pubmed: 9159446
Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2257-62
pubmed: 9402291
Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2762-5
pubmed: 9455849
J Reprod Med. 1998 Jan;43(1):81-6
pubmed: 9475154