Functional divergence of a global regulatory complex governing fungal filamentation.
Candida albicans
/ genetics
Fungal Proteins
/ genetics
Fungi
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
Humans
Hyphae
/ genetics
Morphogenesis
/ genetics
Multiprotein Complexes
/ genetics
Nuclear Proteins
/ genetics
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
/ genetics
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
/ genetics
Trans-Activators
/ genetics
Transcription Factors
/ genetics
Journal
PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
16
12
2018
revised:
17
01
2019
pubmed:
8
1
2019
medline:
12
3
2019
entrez:
8
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Morphogenetic transitions are prevalent in the fungal kingdom. For a leading human fungal pathogen, Candida albicans, the capacity to transition between yeast and filaments is key for virulence. For the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, filamentation enables nutrient acquisition. A recent functional genomic screen in S. cerevisiae identified Mfg1 as a regulator of morphogenesis that acts in complex with Flo8 and Mss11 to mediate transcriptional responses crucial for filamentation. In C. albicans, Mfg1 also interacts physically with Flo8 and Mss11 and is critical for filamentation in response to diverse cues, but the mechanisms through which it regulates morphogenesis remained elusive. Here, we explored the consequences of perturbation of Mfg1, Flo8, and Mss11 on C. albicans morphogenesis, and identified functional divergence of complex members. We observed that C. albicans Mss11 was dispensable for filamentation, and that overexpression of FLO8 caused constitutive filamentation even in the absence of Mfg1. Harnessing transcriptional profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to microarray analysis, we identified divergence between transcriptional targets of Flo8 and Mfg1 in C. albicans. We also established that Flo8 and Mfg1 cooperatively bind to promoters of key regulators of filamentation, including TEC1, for which overexpression was sufficient to restore filamentation in the absence of Flo8 or Mfg1. To further explore the circuitry through which Mfg1 regulates morphogenesis, we employed a novel strategy to select for mutations that restore filamentation in the absence of Mfg1. Whole genome sequencing of filamentation-competent mutants revealed chromosome 6 amplification as a conserved adaptive mechanism. A key determinant of the chromosome 6 amplification is FLO8, as deletion of one allele blocked morphogenesis, and chromosome 6 was not amplified in evolved lineages for which FLO8 was re-located to a different chromosome. Thus, this work highlights rewiring of key morphogenetic regulators over evolutionary time and aneuploidy as an adaptive mechanism driving fungal morphogenesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30615616
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007901
pii: PGENETICS-D-18-01516
pmc: PMC6336345
doi:
Substances chimiques
FLO8 protein, S cerevisaie
0
Fungal Proteins
0
MSS11 protein, S cerevisiae
0
Multiprotein Complexes
0
Nuclear Proteins
0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
0
Trans-Activators
0
Transcription Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1007901Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN-143301
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN-154288
Pays : Canada
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: L.E.C. is a co-founder and shareholder in Bright Angel Therapeutics, a platform company for development of novel antifungal therapeutics. L.E.C. is a consultant for Boragen, a small-molecule development company focused on leveraging the unique chemical properties of boron chemistry for crop protection and animal health.
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11):
pubmed: 28807920
Science. 2006 Jul 21;313(5785):367-70
pubmed: 16857942
Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Oct;15(10):4490-9
pubmed: 15269278
Eukaryot Cell. 2003 Oct;2(5):1053-60
pubmed: 14555488
J Bacteriol. 1994 Feb;176(3):756-63
pubmed: 8300529
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017 Apr;15(4):327-330
pubmed: 28152317
Trends Microbiol. 2014 Dec;22(12):707-14
pubmed: 25262420
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 07;6(4):e18394
pubmed: 21512583
J Bacteriol. 1999 Dec;181(24):7524-30
pubmed: 10601210
Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Jan;9(1):161-71
pubmed: 9436998
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011 Jun;75(2):213-67
pubmed: 21646428
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):13594-9
pubmed: 23904484
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Nov 21;60(12):7468-7480
pubmed: 27736764
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 23;110(30):12367-72
pubmed: 23812752
J Bacteriol. 1990 Mar;172(3):1276-83
pubmed: 2407719
J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Feb;135(Pt 2):425-34
pubmed: 2693597
Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Jul;23(14):2692-701
pubmed: 22621896
Genome Med. 2014 Nov 20;6(11):100
pubmed: 25505934
PLoS One. 2010 May 13;5(5):e10629
pubmed: 20498713
Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 28;19(8):621-9
pubmed: 19327993
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1523-30
pubmed: 11290709
Genetics. 2012 Jan;190(1):23-49
pubmed: 22219507
Science. 2012 Sep 14;337(6100):1353-6
pubmed: 22984072
Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Jan;17(1):295-307
pubmed: 16267276
Electrophoresis. 1999 Dec;20(18):3551-67
pubmed: 10612281
Mol Microbiol. 2008 May;68(3):624-41
pubmed: 18363649
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jan;20(1):133-63
pubmed: 17223626
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Dec 19;4(165):165rv13
pubmed: 23253612
J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 28;276(52):48988-96
pubmed: 11595734
PLoS Genet. 2016 Oct 27;12(10):e1006405
pubmed: 27788136
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 31;6:6741
pubmed: 25824284
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Sep;67(3):400-28, table of contents
pubmed: 12966142
Eukaryot Cell. 2013 Feb;12(2):244-53
pubmed: 23223039
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Feb;15(2):96-108
pubmed: 27867199
J Proteomics. 2014 Apr 4;100:37-43
pubmed: 24513533
PLoS Genet. 2018 Apr 27;14(4):e1007319
pubmed: 29702647
Cell Microbiol. 2010 Mar;12(3):273-82
pubmed: 19919567
Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Nov;8(11):1780-91
pubmed: 19734367
J Proteomics. 2016 Oct 21;149:64-68
pubmed: 27132685
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):13223-8
pubmed: 8917572
EMBO J. 2001 Sep 3;20(17):4742-52
pubmed: 11532938
Genetics. 2017 Nov;207(3):1195-1211
pubmed: 28912344
Proteomics. 2015 Apr;15(8):1432-6
pubmed: 25422071
Mol Microbiol. 1999 May;32(3):533-46
pubmed: 10320576
Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1723-6
pubmed: 7992058
G3 (Bethesda). 2012 Jan;2(1):131-41
pubmed: 22384390
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jan;20(1):115-32
pubmed: 17223625
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4436-9
pubmed: 21746947
Nat Chem Biol. 2007 Sep;3(9):541-8
pubmed: 17710100
PLoS Genet. 2016 Oct 3;12(10):e1006350
pubmed: 27695031
Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jun;22(12):3981-93
pubmed: 12024012
PLoS Genet. 2014 Dec 04;10(12):e1004824
pubmed: 25474009
Genetics. 2018 Jul;209(3):725-741
pubmed: 29724862
Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1077-90
pubmed: 1547504
PLoS Genet. 2009 Oct;5(10):e1000705
pubmed: 19876375
Mol Microbiol. 2001 Dec;42(5):1243-57
pubmed: 11886556
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Dec;10(12):M111.007690
pubmed: 21876204
Cell. 2015 Feb 12;160(4):771-784
pubmed: 25679766
Genetics. 2009 Jul;182(3):799-811
pubmed: 19414562
Curr Biol. 2012 Mar 20;22(6):461-70
pubmed: 22365851
PLoS Pathog. 2014 Oct 30;10(10):e1004478
pubmed: 25356907
Proteomics. 2013 Jan;13(1):22-4
pubmed: 23148064
Eukaryot Cell. 2010 Apr;9(4):634-44
pubmed: 20097739
mSphere. 2017 Mar 1;2(2):
pubmed: 28261668
Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jul;5(4):
pubmed: 28752816
Cell Cycle. 2012 Dec 1;11(23):4294-5
pubmed: 23095675
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):349-52
pubmed: 25731168
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:71-92
pubmed: 26488273
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:69-105
pubmed: 16704346
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017 Sep 8;71:753-775
pubmed: 28886681
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Aug 16;9(10):737-48
pubmed: 21844880
Infect Immun. 2005 Feb;73(2):1239-42
pubmed: 15664973
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Aug;10(8):1004-12
pubmed: 21642508
PLoS Biol. 2013 Sep;11(9):e1001653
pubmed: 24058295
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Nov 6;7(11):3797-3808
pubmed: 28951491