A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in 1- and 2-Year-Olds.
Anisometropia
/ physiopathology
Astigmatism
/ physiopathology
Child, Preschool
Depth Perception
/ physiology
Eyeglasses
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hyperopia
/ physiopathology
Infant
Male
Patient Compliance
Prescriptions
Prospective Studies
Time-to-Treatment
Vision Tests
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Journal
Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
16
08
2018
revised:
05
12
2018
accepted:
27
12
2018
pubmed:
8
1
2019
medline:
25
1
2020
entrez:
8
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Two strategies were compared for managing moderate hyperopia without manifest strabismus among 1- and 2-year-old children: (1) immediate prescription of glasses versus (2) observation without glasses unless reduced distance visual acuity (VA), reduced stereoacuity, or manifest strabismus. Prospective randomized clinical trial. A total of 130 children aged 1 to 2 years with hyperopia between +3.00 diopters (D) and +6.00 D spherical equivalent (SE) in at least 1 eye, anisometropia ≤1.50 D SE, and astigmatism ≤1.50 D based on cycloplegic refraction and no manifest strabismus. Participants were randomly assigned to glasses (1.00 D less than full cycloplegic hyperopia) versus observation and followed every 6 months for 3 years. Glasses were prescribed to those assigned to observation if they met prespecified deterioration criteria of distance VA or near stereoacuity below age norms, or development of manifest strabismus. At the 3-year primary outcome examination, participants were classified as failing the randomized management regimen if distance VA or stereoacuity was below age norms or manifest strabismus was observed (each with and without correction in trial frames, confirmed by masked retest, irrespective of whether deterioration had occurred previously), or if strabismus surgery had been performed. Of the 106 participants (82%) completing the 3-year primary outcome examination, failure occurred in 11 (21%) of 53 in the glasses group and 18 (34%) of 53 in the observation group (difference = -13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -31 to 4; P = 0.14). Sixty-two percent (95% CI, 49-74) in the observation group and 34% (95% CI, 23-48) in the glasses group met deterioration criteria (requiring glasses if not wearing). For 1- and 2-year-olds with uncorrected moderate hyperopia (+3.00 D to +6.00 D SE), our estimates of failure, after 3 years of 6-month follow-ups, are inconclusive and consistent with a small to moderate benefit or no benefit of immediate prescription of glasses compared with careful observation (with glasses only if deteriorated).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30615896
pii: S0161-6420(18)32101-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.049
pmc: PMC6534446
mid: NIHMS1521511
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
876-887Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY011751
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY018810
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY023198
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 EY011751
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;63(4):243-50
pubmed: 435441
Vision Res. 1995 May;35(9):1325-8
pubmed: 7610593
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Nov;41(12):3726-31
pubmed: 11053269
Eye (Lond). 2014 Oct;28(10):1165-73
pubmed: 25033902
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;253(7):1013-9
pubmed: 25952040
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;119(11):1625-8
pubmed: 11709012
Br J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan;70(1):12-5
pubmed: 3947594
Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):678-685.e1
pubmed: 17664011
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):150-8
pubmed: 21959371
J AAPOS. 2008 Feb;12(1):23-6
pubmed: 17720573
Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jul;75(7):414-6
pubmed: 1854694
Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):189-98
pubmed: 8776448
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3074-80
pubmed: 16123404
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):P105-P142
pubmed: 29108744
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;81(10):753-61
pubmed: 15557849
J AAPOS. 2008 Apr;12(2):145-9
pubmed: 18155943
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Sep;119(9):1345-53
pubmed: 11545641
Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;63(4):238-42
pubmed: 435440
Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Nov;69(11):851-3
pubmed: 3904821
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):P143-P183
pubmed: 29108746
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):123-38
pubmed: 20287826
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):607-12
pubmed: 19430325
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):895-903
pubmed: 16751032
Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar;74(3):158-9
pubmed: 2182103
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989 Jun;30(6):1146-58
pubmed: 2732029
Ophthalmology. 2011 Nov;118(11):2251-61
pubmed: 21856012
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Feb;84(2):97-102
pubmed: 17299338
Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(21):2799-810
pubmed: 11587728
Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jan;61(1):8-15
pubmed: 836780
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;144(4):487-96
pubmed: 17707330
J AAPOS. 2004 Aug;8(4):310-3
pubmed: 15314589
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 18;(8):CD007738
pubmed: 25133974
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2317-27
pubmed: 15980217
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 05;9(11):e110663
pubmed: 25372594
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;81(4):233-7
pubmed: 15097764
Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):622-9.e1
pubmed: 24140117
Strabismus. 2004 Dec;12(4):227-45
pubmed: 15545141