The "Dual-Plane" DIEP Flap: Measuring the Effects of Superficial Arterial and Venous Flow Augmentation on Clinical Outcomes.


Journal

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
ISSN: 1098-8947
Titre abrégé: J Reconstr Microsurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502670

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 8 1 2019
medline: 7 1 2020
entrez: 8 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

 Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are routinely elevated on a single dominant perforator from the deep epigastric vascular system. However, the single perforator may not always perfuse an entire flap adequately, particularly suprascarpal tissue. We often perform "dual-plane" single perforator DIEP flaps by rerouting the superficial (SIEA/V) system directly into a branch of the deep (DIEA/V) vascular system pedicle, thus allowing both systems to contribute and enhance flap perfusion.  A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction was reviewed for patients undergoing "dual-plane" DIEP flaps. These were matched to a similar cohort of patients undergoing "traditional" single perforator DIEP free flaps over the same time period. Treatment demographics and flap-specific morbidity outcomes were assessed, including performance in the setting of radiation.  Over 2 years, 23 "dual-plane" DIEP flaps were performed (15 patients), compared with 35 single-perforator "traditional" DIEP flaps (23 patients). Rates of delayed healing were similar between both cohorts (2.9 vs. 4.3%,  The "dual-plane" DIEP flap is one we routinely consider in our algorithm, as it allows for full preservation of functional abdominal musculature, and offers enhanced flap perfusion by incorporating both the deep and superficial (dominant) vascular systems. This results in lower fat necrosis rates, particularly in the setting of post-reconstruction radiation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
 Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are routinely elevated on a single dominant perforator from the deep epigastric vascular system. However, the single perforator may not always perfuse an entire flap adequately, particularly suprascarpal tissue. We often perform "dual-plane" single perforator DIEP flaps by rerouting the superficial (SIEA/V) system directly into a branch of the deep (DIEA/V) vascular system pedicle, thus allowing both systems to contribute and enhance flap perfusion.
METHODS METHODS
 A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction was reviewed for patients undergoing "dual-plane" DIEP flaps. These were matched to a similar cohort of patients undergoing "traditional" single perforator DIEP free flaps over the same time period. Treatment demographics and flap-specific morbidity outcomes were assessed, including performance in the setting of radiation.
RESULTS RESULTS
 Over 2 years, 23 "dual-plane" DIEP flaps were performed (15 patients), compared with 35 single-perforator "traditional" DIEP flaps (23 patients). Rates of delayed healing were similar between both cohorts (2.9 vs. 4.3%,
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
 The "dual-plane" DIEP flap is one we routinely consider in our algorithm, as it allows for full preservation of functional abdominal musculature, and offers enhanced flap perfusion by incorporating both the deep and superficial (dominant) vascular systems. This results in lower fat necrosis rates, particularly in the setting of post-reconstruction radiation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30616244
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677013
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

411-416

Informations de copyright

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Auteurs

Hani Sbitany (H)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Rachel Lentz (R)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Merisa Piper (M)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH