Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who benefit from axitinib dose titration: analysis from a randomised, double-blind phase II study.
Axitinib
Benefit with dose titration
First-line
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Predictive factors
Survival benefit
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2019
07 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2017
accepted:
13
12
2018
entrez:
9
1
2019
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
5
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A prospective, randomised phase II study demonstrated clinical benefit of axitinib dose titration in a subset of treatment-naïve patients treated with axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This analysis evaluated patient baseline characteristics that may impact overall survival (OS) with axitinib dose titration. Following a 4-week lead-in period during which all patients received axitinib 5 mg twice-daily (bid); patients meeting the predefined randomisation criteria were randomly assigned to receive axitinib 5 mg bid plus either axitinib or placebo titration. In exploratory analyses, patients were grouped into those who achieved OS ≥24 versus < 24 months, and compared their baseline characteristics with Fisher's exact test or Cochran-Armitage trend exact test, with a 5% significance level. Potential predictive baseline characteristics associated with effect of axitinib dose titration on OS were investigated using a Cox proportional hazard model. Overall, 112 patients were randomised. Three of 56 patients receiving axitinib titration were censored; of the remaining 53, 33 (62%) achieved OS ≥24 months versus 20 (38%) with OS < 24 months. Patients with OS ≥24 vs. < 24 months, respectively, had significantly fewer metastatic sites (≤2 metastases: 52% vs. 10%; ≥3 metastases: 48% vs. 90%), fewer lymph node (45% vs. 75%) or liver (15% vs. 45%) metastases, higher haemoglobin level (i.e., ≥ lower limit of normal: 67% vs. 25%) at baseline, lower neutrophil (≤ upper limit of normal, 97% vs. 75%) and platelet (≤ upper limit of normal, 82% vs. 50%) levels at baseline and ≥ 1 year between histopathological diagnosis and treatment (64% vs. 15%). The primary reason for treatment discontinuation in both OS groups was disease progression. The frequency of toxicity-related discontinuation was comparable between the 2 groups, indicating that it was not a factor for a shorter OS. The multivariate analysis showed that ≥1 year from histopathological diagnosis to treatment and baseline haemoglobin level equal or greater than lower limit of normal were significant covariates associated with favourable OS in patients receiving axitinib titration. The current analyses identified potentially predictive factors that could help selecting patients who may benefit from axitinib dose titration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00835978. Registered prospectively, February 4, 2009.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A prospective, randomised phase II study demonstrated clinical benefit of axitinib dose titration in a subset of treatment-naïve patients treated with axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This analysis evaluated patient baseline characteristics that may impact overall survival (OS) with axitinib dose titration.
METHODS
METHODS
Following a 4-week lead-in period during which all patients received axitinib 5 mg twice-daily (bid); patients meeting the predefined randomisation criteria were randomly assigned to receive axitinib 5 mg bid plus either axitinib or placebo titration. In exploratory analyses, patients were grouped into those who achieved OS ≥24 versus < 24 months, and compared their baseline characteristics with Fisher's exact test or Cochran-Armitage trend exact test, with a 5% significance level. Potential predictive baseline characteristics associated with effect of axitinib dose titration on OS were investigated using a Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 112 patients were randomised. Three of 56 patients receiving axitinib titration were censored; of the remaining 53, 33 (62%) achieved OS ≥24 months versus 20 (38%) with OS < 24 months. Patients with OS ≥24 vs. < 24 months, respectively, had significantly fewer metastatic sites (≤2 metastases: 52% vs. 10%; ≥3 metastases: 48% vs. 90%), fewer lymph node (45% vs. 75%) or liver (15% vs. 45%) metastases, higher haemoglobin level (i.e., ≥ lower limit of normal: 67% vs. 25%) at baseline, lower neutrophil (≤ upper limit of normal, 97% vs. 75%) and platelet (≤ upper limit of normal, 82% vs. 50%) levels at baseline and ≥ 1 year between histopathological diagnosis and treatment (64% vs. 15%). The primary reason for treatment discontinuation in both OS groups was disease progression. The frequency of toxicity-related discontinuation was comparable between the 2 groups, indicating that it was not a factor for a shorter OS. The multivariate analysis showed that ≥1 year from histopathological diagnosis to treatment and baseline haemoglobin level equal or greater than lower limit of normal were significant covariates associated with favourable OS in patients receiving axitinib titration.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The current analyses identified potentially predictive factors that could help selecting patients who may benefit from axitinib dose titration.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00835978. Registered prospectively, February 4, 2009.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30616534
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5224-6
pii: 10.1186/s12885-018-5224-6
pmc: PMC6322336
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Axitinib
C9LVQ0YUXG
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00835978']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17Références
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):289-96
pubmed: 11773181
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):317-25
pubmed: 19136199
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5794-9
pubmed: 19826129
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):141-8
pubmed: 23312463
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62
pubmed: 23598172
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2470-7
pubmed: 23695024
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1233-42
pubmed: 24140184
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):81-9
pubmed: 24215209
Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug;8(2):881-885
pubmed: 25013512
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Dec;14(6):499-503
pubmed: 27236772
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 29;:null
pubmed: 27572087
Cancer Sci. 2017 Jun;108(6):1231-1239
pubmed: 28267243