Immunization of young heifers with staphylococcal immune evasion proteins before natural exposure to Staphylococcus aureus induces a humoral immune response in serum and milk.
Animals
Antibodies, Bacterial
/ blood
Bacterial Proteins
/ immunology
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
/ immunology
Female
Immune Evasion
/ immunology
Immunity, Humoral
/ immunology
Immunization
/ veterinary
Milk
/ immunology
Staphylococcal Infections
/ immunology
Staphylococcal Vaccines
/ therapeutic use
Staphylococcus aureus
/ immunology
Cattle
Efb
Experimental immunization
LukM
Mastitis
Milk antibodies
Natural exposure
Non-protective immunity
Staphylococcus aureus
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2019
07 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
04
09
2018
accepted:
26
12
2018
entrez:
9
1
2019
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
25
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Staphylococcus aureus, a leading cause of mastitis in dairy cattle, causes severe mastitis and/or chronic persistent infections with detrimental effects on the cows' wellbeing, lifespan and milk production. Despite years of research there is no effective vaccine against S. aureus mastitis. Boosting of non-protective pre-existing immunity to S. aureus, induced by natural exposure to S. aureus, by vaccination may interfere with vaccine efficacy. The aim was to assess whether experimental immunization of S. aureus naïve animals results in an immune response that differs from immunity following natural exposure to S. aureus. First, to define the period during which calves are immunologically naïve for S. aureus, Efb, LukM, and whole-cell S. aureus specific serum antibodies were measured in a cohort of newborn calves by ELISA. Rising S. aureus specific antibodies indicated that from week 12 onward calves mounted an immune response to S. aureus due to natural exposure. Next, an experimental immunization trial was set up using 8-week-old heifer calves (n = 16), half of which were immunized with the immune evasion molecules Efb and LukM. Immunization was repeated after one year and before parturition and humoral and cellular immunity specific for Efb and LukM was determined throughout the study. Post-partum, antibody levels against LukM and EfB were significantly higher in serum, colostrum and milk in the experimentally immunized animals compared to animals naturally exposed to S. aureus. LukM specific IL17a responses were also significantly higher in the immunized cows post-partum. Experimental immunization with staphylococcal immune evasion molecules starting before natural exposure resulted in significantly higher antibody levels against Efb and LukM around parturition in serum as well as the site of infection, i.e. in colostrum and milk, compared to natural exposure to S. aureus. This study showed that it is practically feasible to vaccinate S. aureus naïve cattle and that experimental immunization induced a humoral immune response that differed from that after natural exposure only.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Staphylococcus aureus, a leading cause of mastitis in dairy cattle, causes severe mastitis and/or chronic persistent infections with detrimental effects on the cows' wellbeing, lifespan and milk production. Despite years of research there is no effective vaccine against S. aureus mastitis. Boosting of non-protective pre-existing immunity to S. aureus, induced by natural exposure to S. aureus, by vaccination may interfere with vaccine efficacy. The aim was to assess whether experimental immunization of S. aureus naïve animals results in an immune response that differs from immunity following natural exposure to S. aureus.
RESULTS
RESULTS
First, to define the period during which calves are immunologically naïve for S. aureus, Efb, LukM, and whole-cell S. aureus specific serum antibodies were measured in a cohort of newborn calves by ELISA. Rising S. aureus specific antibodies indicated that from week 12 onward calves mounted an immune response to S. aureus due to natural exposure. Next, an experimental immunization trial was set up using 8-week-old heifer calves (n = 16), half of which were immunized with the immune evasion molecules Efb and LukM. Immunization was repeated after one year and before parturition and humoral and cellular immunity specific for Efb and LukM was determined throughout the study. Post-partum, antibody levels against LukM and EfB were significantly higher in serum, colostrum and milk in the experimentally immunized animals compared to animals naturally exposed to S. aureus. LukM specific IL17a responses were also significantly higher in the immunized cows post-partum.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Experimental immunization with staphylococcal immune evasion molecules starting before natural exposure resulted in significantly higher antibody levels against Efb and LukM around parturition in serum as well as the site of infection, i.e. in colostrum and milk, compared to natural exposure to S. aureus. This study showed that it is practically feasible to vaccinate S. aureus naïve cattle and that experimental immunization induced a humoral immune response that differed from that after natural exposure only.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30616609
doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1765-9
pii: 10.1186/s12917-018-1765-9
pmc: PMC6323680
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bacterial
0
Bacterial Proteins
0
Staphylococcal Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Dutch government
ID : ALTANT EVAC2
Références
J Immunol. 2000 Apr 1;164(7):3713-22
pubmed: 10725730
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Mar 15;72(3-4):321-7
pubmed: 10727841
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Mar;83(3):418-29
pubmed: 10750097
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998 Jul;3(3):233-46
pubmed: 10819511
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Sep;83(9):1966-75
pubmed: 11003225
Trends Immunol. 2001 Jan;22(1):41-7
pubmed: 11286691
Res Vet Sci. 1975 Sep;19(2):152-8
pubmed: 1166119
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Dec;84(12):2649-63
pubmed: 11814021
Epidemiol Infect. 2002 Oct;129(2):397-416
pubmed: 12403116
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Nov;40(11):3894-902
pubmed: 12409348
Biologicals. 2003 Jun;31(2):123-5
pubmed: 12770543
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;43(5):439-57
pubmed: 15005373
Infect Immun. 2004 Apr;72(4):2177-85
pubmed: 15039341
Nat Med. 2005 Apr;11(4 Suppl):S45-53
pubmed: 15812489
J Dairy Res. 2005;72 Spec No:107-12
pubmed: 16180728
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Feb 1;228(3):422-5
pubmed: 16448371
Microb Pathog. 2006 Apr;40(4):177-83
pubmed: 16517115
Microbes Infect. 2006 Jul;8(8):2068-74
pubmed: 16782383
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006 Sep;53(7):326-32
pubmed: 16930277
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007 Dec 15;120(3-4):201-11
pubmed: 17658619
Infect Immun. 1991 Mar;59(3):1008-14
pubmed: 1847696
Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Jul;43 Suppl 2:252-9
pubmed: 18638132
Infect Immun. 2008 Oct;76(10):4574-80
pubmed: 18644876
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000703
pubmed: 20041174
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 Mar;5(2):120-7
pubmed: 20543588
Microb Pathog. 2010 Dec;49(6):354-62
pubmed: 20624452
Immunity. 2010 Oct 29;33(4):492-503
pubmed: 21029960
Vet Microbiol. 2011 Mar 24;148(2-4):117-24
pubmed: 21115309
Vaccine. 2012 Mar 9;30(12):2116-24
pubmed: 22285272
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012 Jul;28(2):203-16
pubmed: 22664203
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):219-33
pubmed: 23164233
Microbiology. 2013 Jan;159(Pt 1):1-11
pubmed: 23175507
Immunol Lett. 2013 Feb;150(1-2):12-22
pubmed: 23376548
PLoS One. 2013 May 16;8(5):e63471
pubmed: 23696826
Vet Res. 2013 Jun 11;44:40
pubmed: 23758654
Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Jan;21:602-15
pubmed: 23974078
PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(12):e1003816
pubmed: 24348255
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014 Jun;78(2):199-230
pubmed: 24847020
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6907-16
pubmed: 25242420
Am J Vet Res. 2014 Dec;75(12):1076-82
pubmed: 25419807
Res Vet Sci. 2015 Jun;100:88-99
pubmed: 25975626
MBio. 2015 Jun 04;6(3):e00335
pubmed: 26045537
Vet Res. 2015 Jun 11;46:56
pubmed: 26062913
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Sep;13(9):529-43
pubmed: 26272408
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0137755
pubmed: 26375594
Vet Res. 2015 Sep 28;46:115
pubmed: 26411347
J Dairy Res. 2016 Feb;83(1):72-80
pubmed: 26568557
Acta Vet Scand. 2015 Nov 25;57:81
pubmed: 26608421
Res Vet Sci. 2016 Oct;108:8-17
pubmed: 27663364
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 25;6:37759
pubmed: 27886237
Vet Microbiol. 2017 May;203:286-293
pubmed: 28619159
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4811
pubmed: 28684793
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 May;65 Suppl 1:149-165
pubmed: 28984427
Vet Res. 2018 Mar 1;49(1):25
pubmed: 29490692
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1987 Feb;14(2):145-56
pubmed: 3564362
J Dairy Sci. 1979 Jan;62(1):154-67
pubmed: 379059
Am J Vet Res. 1980 Sep;41(9):1427-31
pubmed: 7192523
Vaccine. 1993 Sep;11(12):1179-84
pubmed: 8256498
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Mar;81(3):687-93
pubmed: 9565871