Bilateral cochlear implantation is regarded as very beneficial: results from a worldwide survey by online questionnaire.
Bilateral cochlear implant
Paediatric cochlear implant
Sequential cochlear implant
Simultaneous cochlear implant
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
09
11
2018
accepted:
24
12
2018
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
entrez:
9
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) provision is now widely regarded as the most beneficial hearing intervention for acceptable candidates. This study sought to determine if a number of well-regarded hearing professionals at highly reputable clinics shared similar practices and beliefs regarding bilateral CI provision, use, and rehabilitation in children and adults. An 11-question online questionnaire was created and distributed to all 27 clinics in the HEARRING group. Questions 1-5 asked for facts; questions 6-11 asked for opinions. 20 completed questionnaires were returned. All 20 respondents reported that their clinics perform bilateral cochlear implantation in children; 18 do so in adults. Regarding the fact-based questions, bilateral CI provision is more commonly performed and more likely to be reimbursed in children than in adults. Children are also much more likely to be implanted simultaneously than are adults. Regarding the opinion-based questions, respondents gave broadly similar answers. Communication between the CIs and speech coding strategies specifically developed for bilateral CI users were regarded as the two future technologies that would most enhance the benefit of bilateral CI use. Most clinics in the HEARRING group are very familiar with bilateral CI provision and hold similar opinions on its results and benefits. Hopefully the results described herein will lead to a greater acceptance and regular reimbursement of bilateral CI provision, especially in adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30617425
doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-05271-x
pii: 10.1007/s00405-018-05271-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
679-683Références
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb;16(1):69-74
pubmed: 18197026
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):107-8
pubmed: 18223440
Cochlear Implants Int. 2008 Jun;9(2):65-9
pubmed: 18756442
Int J Audiol. 2009;48(9):601-17
pubmed: 19382017
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;17(5):351-5
pubmed: 19606037
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Oct;39(5):479-85
pubmed: 20828508
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):561-5
pubmed: 22569146
Int J Audiol. 2012 Nov;51(11):817-32
pubmed: 22937981
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Feb;34(2):190-8
pubmed: 23444466
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):1694-9
pubmed: 24390811
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jul;37(6):658-64
pubmed: 27153328
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1161-1168
pubmed: 27667732
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Jan;96(1):35-39
pubmed: 27978586
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Jan;18(1):2-22
pubmed: 28010679
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep 1;143(9):881-890
pubmed: 28655036
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;102:10-14
pubmed: 29106853
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Feb;39(2):177-183
pubmed: 29227442
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:170-177
pubmed: 29287861