[Poststroke care in Germany : Results of an online survey of inpatient and outpatient experts in southern Germany].
Schlaganfallnachsorge in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Online-Befragung stationär und ambulant tätiger Experten in Süddeutschland.
Discharge process
Interdisciplinary cooperation
Neurological rehabilitation
Outpatient treatment
Stroke
Journal
Der Nervenarzt
ISSN: 1433-0407
Titre abrégé: Nervenarzt
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
20
9
2019
entrez:
9
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To avoid long-term care after stroke and to promote occupational reintegration as well as to continue improving rehabilitation results, a good inpatient and outpatient care is necessary. More importantly a gapless transition into aftercare is required. The aim of this study was to gather expert opinions and experiences on the current care process during rehabilitation discharge and aftercare as well as to identify barriers and to discuss possible solutions. Clinicians from inpatient neurological rehabilitation, general practitioners and physiotherapists working in outpatient rehabilitation from Baden-Württemberg (BW) and Bavaria (BY) took part in an online survey on poststroke care (n = 77). The following topics were addressed: discharge process into follow-up care, follow-up care after rehabilitation; as well as cooperation and communication in the discharge process and during follow-up care. The online survey was conducted between 1 June 2017 and 3 August 2017 and was descriptively analyzed. The perceptions of inpatient and outpatient experts with respect to significance and barriers of the factors involved in the discharge process and in the aftercare were mainly discrepant. In particular, the interdisciplinary cooperation and communication were criticized. Differences were mentioned depending on the occupational group, when asked about the leading cause that makes it difficult for the patient to return to their home environment. Practitioner networks and standardized communication pathways can help to strengthen intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary cooperation and communication and thus achieve an improvement in the discharge process as well as in the aftercare system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To avoid long-term care after stroke and to promote occupational reintegration as well as to continue improving rehabilitation results, a good inpatient and outpatient care is necessary. More importantly a gapless transition into aftercare is required. The aim of this study was to gather expert opinions and experiences on the current care process during rehabilitation discharge and aftercare as well as to identify barriers and to discuss possible solutions.
METHODS
METHODS
Clinicians from inpatient neurological rehabilitation, general practitioners and physiotherapists working in outpatient rehabilitation from Baden-Württemberg (BW) and Bavaria (BY) took part in an online survey on poststroke care (n = 77). The following topics were addressed: discharge process into follow-up care, follow-up care after rehabilitation; as well as cooperation and communication in the discharge process and during follow-up care. The online survey was conducted between 1 June 2017 and 3 August 2017 and was descriptively analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The perceptions of inpatient and outpatient experts with respect to significance and barriers of the factors involved in the discharge process and in the aftercare were mainly discrepant. In particular, the interdisciplinary cooperation and communication were criticized. Differences were mentioned depending on the occupational group, when asked about the leading cause that makes it difficult for the patient to return to their home environment.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Practitioner networks and standardized communication pathways can help to strengthen intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary cooperation and communication and thus achieve an improvement in the discharge process as well as in the aftercare system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30617567
doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0655-5
pii: 10.1007/s00115-018-0655-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
824-831Références
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Mar;70(3):170-6
pubmed: 18415925
Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Mar;38(2):317-34
pubmed: 21320840
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):590-6
pubmed: 22142882
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Feb;138(1):45-52
pubmed: 22403014
Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Feb;76(2):79-85
pubmed: 23572472
Nervenarzt. 2013 Oct;84(10):1228-32
pubmed: 24048549
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Nov 28;15:189
pubmed: 25430723
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Jul;77(7):513-21; quiz 522-3
pubmed: 26227386
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Oct;54(5):332-8
pubmed: 26505185