The interhemispheric approach in children: our experience and review of the literature.
Interhemispheric
Morbidity
Pediatric neurosurgery
Surgical approach
Ventricular lesions
Journal
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1433-0350
Titre abrégé: Childs Nerv Syst
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8503227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
accepted:
26
12
2018
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
12
5
2020
entrez:
9
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The interhemispheric approach (IA) has been extensively described for treating pathologies located at the lateral or third ventricle, pineal region, and periventricular locations. While these anatomical locations are the target of many pediatric pathologies, very few series have analyzed the morbidity and outcome of the IA in children. The aim of this study is to describe our experience using the IA in children, emphasizing the approach-related morbidity. Twenty-six patients underwent 28 procedures using the IA between the years 2012 and 2016. Data for these patients was retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and approach-related morbidity were collected and analyzed. The mean age of the cohort was 10.1 ± 4.2 years and included 15 females (57.7%). Approach-related morbidity occurred following eight surgeries (28.6%; seven with anterior IA and one with posterior IA), including two pseudomeningoceles (7.1%), three persistent subdural effusions (10.7%), of which two were locally drained and one required subduro-peritoneal shunting, one epidural bleed (3.6%) which resolved spontaneously, and two infections (3.6%) treated with antibiotics. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks, supplementary motor area syndrome, seizures, and subdural hematomas did not occur in any of the patients. None of the approach-related complications led to permanent morbidity or to mortality. The IA for lesions in and around the ventricular system is feasible and associated with a low permanent complication rate. When choosing this approach, the morbidity, although rarely permanent, should be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30617576
doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-04039-2
pii: 10.1007/s00381-018-04039-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
445-452Références
J Neurol. 2012 Sep;259(9):1860-7
pubmed: 22289969
J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan;110(1):112-5
pubmed: 18834265
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1483-96; discussion 1496
pubmed: 21107179
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):525-34
pubmed: 15223199
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1066-75
pubmed: 18695527
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;108(8):790-3
pubmed: 16325995
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(4):321-5; discussion 325-6
pubmed: 11437284
Surg Neurol. 2008 May;69(5):447-53; discussion 453-6
pubmed: 18295836
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):527-33
pubmed: 21529194
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1 Suppl 1):ONS41-9; discussion ONS41-9
pubmed: 16888550
Surg Neurol. 1989 Aug;32(2):111-5
pubmed: 2749453
J Neurosurg. 1991 May;74(5):715-9
pubmed: 2013771
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Oct;14(4):365-71
pubmed: 25105512