High flow nasal therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acute respiratory failure
High flow nasal cannula
High flow nasal therapy
Immunocompromised patients
Mechanical ventilation
Noninvasive ventilation
Oxygen therapy
Journal
Journal of critical care
ISSN: 1557-8615
Titre abrégé: J Crit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610642
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
revised:
27
12
2018
accepted:
27
12
2018
pubmed:
10
1
2019
medline:
23
5
2020
entrez:
10
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) as compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in immunocompromised patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to address this issue. We searched PubMed, Medline and Embase until November 7th, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized prospective and retrospective evidence were selected. Observational studies were considered for sensitivity analysis. Primary outcome was mortality rate; intubation rate was a secondary outcome. We included four studies in the primary analysis: one RCT, two RCT's post-hoc analyses and one retrospective study. We found no significant difference in short-term mortality comparing HFNT vs. COT: 1) ICU: n = 872 patients, odds ratio (OR) = 0.80 [0.44,1.45], p = 0.46, I We found no benefit of HFNT over COT on mortality in immunocompromised patients with ARF. However, HFNT was associated with a lower intubation rate warranting further research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30622042
pii: S0883-9441(18)31675-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
250-256Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.