Impact of Electronic Self-Assessment and Self-Care Technology on Adherence to Clinician Recommendations and Self-Management Activity for Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
electronic symptom assessment
neoplasms
quality of life
self-care
treatment adherence and compliance
Journal
JMIR cancer
ISSN: 2369-1999
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cancer
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2019
08 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
25
06
2018
accepted:
04
11
2018
revised:
18
10
2018
entrez:
10
1
2019
pubmed:
10
1
2019
medline:
10
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients undergoing cancer treatment experience symptoms that negatively affect their quality of life and adherence to treatment. The early identification and management of treatment-related symptoms are critical to prevent symptom distress due to unmanaged symptoms. However, the early identification and management of treatment-related symptoms are complex as most cancer treatments are delivered on an outpatient basis where patients are granted less face-to-face time with clinicians. The Electronic Symptom Assessment and Self-Care (ESRA-C) promotes participant self-management of treatment-related symptoms by providing participants with communication coaching and symptom self-report, education, and tracking features. While the ESRA-C intervention has been demonstrated to improve symptom distress significantly, little is known as to how the ESRA-C influenced participants' self-management practices and adherence to clinician recommendations for symptom/quality of life issues (SQIs). To compare participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs between ESRA-C intervention and control (electronic symptom assessment and participant symptom reports alone) group participants. Secondarily, we explored the impact of participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs on symptom control, symptom management satisfaction, and symptom distress. Lastly, we examined baseline predictors of participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs. This study presents an analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Participants beginning a new chemotherapy or radiotherapy regimen were recruited from oncology outpatient centers and were randomized to receive the ESRA-C intervention or control during treatment. Patients were included in this analysis if they remained on study through the duration of treatment and self-reported at least one bothersome SQI three-to-six weeks after beginning treatment. The Symptom Distress Scale-15 and Self-Management of SQIs Questionnaire were completed two weeks later. Based on Self-Management of SQIs Questionnaire ratings, participants were placed into adherence to clinician recommendations (adhered/did not adhere/did not receive recommendations) and additional self-management strategy use (yes/no) categories. Most participants were adherent to clinician recommendations (273/370, 73.8%), while fewer used additional self-management strategies for SQIs (182/370, 49.2%). There were no differences in the frequency of participant adherence to clinician recommendations (chi-square test, P=.99) or self-management strategy use (chi-square test, P=.80) between intervention (n=182) and control treatment groups (n=188). Participants who received clinician recommendations reported the highest treatment satisfaction (n=355, P<.001 by analysis of variance; ANOVA), although lowest distress was reported by participants who did not follow clinician recommendations (n=322, P=.04 by ANOVA) for top 2 SQIs. Women (n=188) reported greater additional self-management strategy use than men (n=182, P=0.03 by chi-square test). ESRA-C intervention use did not improve participants' adherence to clinician recommendations or additional self-management strategy use for SQIs in comparison to the control. Future research is needed to determine which factors are important in improving patients' self-management practices and symptom distress following ESRA-C use. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00852852; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00852852 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73rEhNWkU).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing cancer treatment experience symptoms that negatively affect their quality of life and adherence to treatment. The early identification and management of treatment-related symptoms are critical to prevent symptom distress due to unmanaged symptoms. However, the early identification and management of treatment-related symptoms are complex as most cancer treatments are delivered on an outpatient basis where patients are granted less face-to-face time with clinicians. The Electronic Symptom Assessment and Self-Care (ESRA-C) promotes participant self-management of treatment-related symptoms by providing participants with communication coaching and symptom self-report, education, and tracking features. While the ESRA-C intervention has been demonstrated to improve symptom distress significantly, little is known as to how the ESRA-C influenced participants' self-management practices and adherence to clinician recommendations for symptom/quality of life issues (SQIs).
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To compare participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs between ESRA-C intervention and control (electronic symptom assessment and participant symptom reports alone) group participants. Secondarily, we explored the impact of participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs on symptom control, symptom management satisfaction, and symptom distress. Lastly, we examined baseline predictors of participant adherence to clinician recommendations and additional self-management strategy use for SQIs.
METHODS
METHODS
This study presents an analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Participants beginning a new chemotherapy or radiotherapy regimen were recruited from oncology outpatient centers and were randomized to receive the ESRA-C intervention or control during treatment. Patients were included in this analysis if they remained on study through the duration of treatment and self-reported at least one bothersome SQI three-to-six weeks after beginning treatment. The Symptom Distress Scale-15 and Self-Management of SQIs Questionnaire were completed two weeks later. Based on Self-Management of SQIs Questionnaire ratings, participants were placed into adherence to clinician recommendations (adhered/did not adhere/did not receive recommendations) and additional self-management strategy use (yes/no) categories.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most participants were adherent to clinician recommendations (273/370, 73.8%), while fewer used additional self-management strategies for SQIs (182/370, 49.2%). There were no differences in the frequency of participant adherence to clinician recommendations (chi-square test, P=.99) or self-management strategy use (chi-square test, P=.80) between intervention (n=182) and control treatment groups (n=188). Participants who received clinician recommendations reported the highest treatment satisfaction (n=355, P<.001 by analysis of variance; ANOVA), although lowest distress was reported by participants who did not follow clinician recommendations (n=322, P=.04 by ANOVA) for top 2 SQIs. Women (n=188) reported greater additional self-management strategy use than men (n=182, P=0.03 by chi-square test).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
ESRA-C intervention use did not improve participants' adherence to clinician recommendations or additional self-management strategy use for SQIs in comparison to the control. Future research is needed to determine which factors are important in improving patients' self-management practices and symptom distress following ESRA-C use.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00852852; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00852852 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73rEhNWkU).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30622093
pii: v5i1e11395
doi: 10.2196/11395
pmc: PMC6329427
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00852852']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11395Informations de copyright
©Robert Knoerl, Fangxin Hong, Traci Blonquist, Donna Berry. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (http://cancer.jmir.org), 08.01.2019.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2772-80
pubmed: 15837992
Cancer Invest. 2008 Jul;26(6):647-51
pubmed: 18584358
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Jan;37(1):E7-E15
pubmed: 20044334
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4120-8
pubmed: 20585090
Oral Oncol. 2013 Apr;49(4):360-6
pubmed: 23168337
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 20;15(2):e37
pubmed: 23425685
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3085-93
pubmed: 23828394
J Breast Cancer. 2013 Jun;16(2):229-35
pubmed: 23843858
Support Care Cancer. 2014 May;22(5):1171-9
pubmed: 24337684
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 20;32(3):199-205
pubmed: 24344222
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jul 12;14:513
pubmed: 25014995
Cancer Nurs. 1978 Oct;1(5):373-8
pubmed: 250445
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):245-52
pubmed: 25082386
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 18;16(12):e295
pubmed: 25525672
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 03;17(6):e136
pubmed: 26041682
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2763-71
pubmed: 26169621
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(4):E9-E23
pubmed: 26252436
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Nov 04;9:1587-92
pubmed: 26604712
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;21:215-22
pubmed: 26645947
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):92-100
pubmed: 27612178
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Sep 12;7:127-35
pubmed: 27672346
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1323-1355
pubmed: 28058570
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2918-2926
pubmed: 28464268
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Jan;14(1):42-46
pubmed: 28915077
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):361-374
pubmed: 28948360
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1770-1779
pubmed: 29390165
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jul;57(7):924-934
pubmed: 29451059
Semin Oncol Nurs. 1987 Nov;3(4):248-56
pubmed: 3423446