Deleterious alleles in the context of domestication, inbreeding, and selection.

deleterious alleles domestication genetic load inbreeding selection

Journal

Evolutionary applications
ISSN: 1752-4571
Titre abrégé: Evol Appl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101461828

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 20 11 2017
revised: 30 05 2018
accepted: 12 06 2018
entrez: 10 1 2019
pubmed: 10 1 2019
medline: 10 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Each individual has a certain number of harmful mutations in its genome. These mutations can lower the fitness of the individual carrying them, dependent on their dominance and selection coefficient. Effective population size, selection, and admixture are known to affect the occurrence of such mutations in a population. The relative roles of demography and selection are a key in understanding the process of adaptation. These are factors that are potentially influenced and confounded in domestic animals. Here, we hypothesize that the series of events of bottlenecks, introgression, and strong artificial selection associated with domestication increased mutational load in domestic species. Yet, mutational load is hard to quantify, so there are very few studies available revealing the relevance of evolutionary processes. The precise role of artificial selection, bottlenecks, and introgression in further increasing the load of deleterious variants in animals in breeding and conservation programmes remains unclear. In this paper, we review the effects of domestication and selection on mutational load in domestic species. Moreover, we test some hypotheses on higher mutational load due to domestication and selective sweeps using sequence data from commercial pig and chicken lines. Overall, we argue that domestication by itself is not a prerequisite for genetic erosion, indicating that fitness potential does not need to decline. Rather, mutational load in domestic species can be influenced by many factors, but consistent or strong trends are not yet clear. However, methods emerging from molecular genetics allow discrimination of hypotheses about the determinants of mutational load, such as effective population size, inbreeding, and selection, in domestic systems. These findings make us rethink the effect of our current breeding schemes on fitness of populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30622631
doi: 10.1111/eva.12691
pii: EVA12691
pmc: PMC6304688
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

6-17

Références

Genetics. 1963 Oct;48:1303-12
pubmed: 14071753
Nat Genet. 2010 Nov;42(11):969-72
pubmed: 20890277
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Oct 2;95(4):421-36
pubmed: 25279984
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jul 16;15:601
pubmed: 25030608
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6792-5
pubmed: 8692897
PLoS Genet. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002240
pubmed: 21901107
Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Jun;110(6):530-7
pubmed: 23321706
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Jan 10;4(1):163-71
pubmed: 24281428
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Sep 21;49(1):71
pubmed: 28934946
Genetics. 2014 Nov;198(3):1183-208
pubmed: 25194161
BMC Genomics. 2011 Sep 23;12:460
pubmed: 21943305
J Mol Evol. 2001 Mar;52(3):302-8
pubmed: 11428467
Mol Ecol. 2014 Aug;23(16):4089-102
pubmed: 24863459
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 05;4(8):e6524
pubmed: 19654876
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1141-8
pubmed: 26323058
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Dec;41:150-158
pubmed: 27744216
Trends Genet. 2006 Mar;22(3):126-31
pubmed: 16443304
BMC Genomics. 2015 Apr 18;16:312
pubmed: 25927203
Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):994-7
pubmed: 18288194
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jul 22;16:542
pubmed: 26198692
Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335-55
pubmed: 4630587
Genome Biol. 2016 Jun 06;17(1):122
pubmed: 27268795
Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Mar;110(3):277-82
pubmed: 23211792
Am Nat. 1946 May-Jun;80:318-42
pubmed: 20982738
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jun 1;34(6):1417-1428
pubmed: 28333215
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Sep;32(9):2273-83
pubmed: 25939650
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jun;16(6):333-43
pubmed: 25963372
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Apr 16;50(1):17
pubmed: 29661130
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Nov;10(11):783-96
pubmed: 19834483
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Sep;33(9):2307-17
pubmed: 27301592
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):152-7
pubmed: 26699508
BMC Genomics. 2017 Nov 09;18(1):858
pubmed: 29121877
Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519-20
pubmed: 1560824
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):220-4
pubmed: 24509481
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec;31(12):940-952
pubmed: 27743611
Science. 2011 Feb 18;331(6019):920-4
pubmed: 21330547
BMC Genet. 2015 May 28;16:54
pubmed: 26018295
Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1461-76
pubmed: 22298709
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(16):e164
pubmed: 20601685
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Nov;25(11):2331-6
pubmed: 18689870
Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96-8
pubmed: 4585855
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Apr 1;34(4):908-924
pubmed: 28087781
Science. 2005 Mar 11;307(5715):1618-21
pubmed: 15761152
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003815
pubmed: 24086152
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan;10(1):e1004049
pubmed: 24391517
Genome Res. 2005 Jul;15(7):901-13
pubmed: 15965027
Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):393-8
pubmed: 23151582
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):261-3
pubmed: 25141177
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 14;8(11):e80813
pubmed: 24348915
Evol Appl. 2008 May;1(2):342-55
pubmed: 25567636
Mol Ecol. 2013 Dec;22(24):6091-9
pubmed: 24128280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11715-11720
pubmed: 29042518
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):310-5
pubmed: 24487276
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1003100
pubmed: 23209444
Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 15;5:4392
pubmed: 25025832
Evol Appl. 2018 Sep 08;12(1):6-17
pubmed: 30622631
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:535-60
pubmed: 25062362
Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35
pubmed: 4407212
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):276-290
pubmed: 29325102
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0170039
pubmed: 28107382
PLoS Genet. 2006 Apr;2(4):e64
pubmed: 16683038
Evolution. 2000 Dec;54(6):1855-61
pubmed: 11209765
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):173-211
pubmed: 17437557
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Oct 14;17(11):704-714
pubmed: 27739533
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul 11;93(1):90-102
pubmed: 23746547
Genetics. 2013 Nov;195(3):969-78
pubmed: 23979573
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):6153-61
pubmed: 22118103
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073-81
pubmed: 19561590
Genome Res. 2016 Oct;26(10):1333-1341
pubmed: 27646536
Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Nov;26(6):669-73
pubmed: 4440678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 30;111(52):E5661-9
pubmed: 25512547
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014 Dec;29:139-46
pubmed: 25461617

Auteurs

Mirte Bosse (M)

Animal Breeding and Genomics Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.

Hendrik-Jan Megens (HJ)

Animal Breeding and Genomics Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.

Martijn F L Derks (MFL)

Animal Breeding and Genomics Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.

Ángeles M R de Cara (ÁMR)

Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive CNRS Université de Montpellier Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 EPHE, IRD Montpellier France.

Martien A M Groenen (MAM)

Animal Breeding and Genomics Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH