Soda, salad, and socioeconomic status: Findings from the Seattle Obesity Study (SOS).
Diet
Geographic information systems
Residential property values
Socioeconomic status
Journal
SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
01
06
2018
revised:
08
12
2018
accepted:
09
12
2018
entrez:
10
1
2019
pubmed:
10
1
2019
medline:
10
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Documenting geographic disparities in dietary behaviors can help inform public health interventions at the local level. To study and visualize socioeconomic gradient in soda and salad consumption using a geo-localized measure of socioeconomic status in contrast to more traditional measures. Geo-localized dietary intake data came from the Seattle Obesity Study I, a population-based sample of King County adults (n=1099). Socio-demographic data and soda and salad consumption frequencies (times/week) were obtained by 20-min telephone survey. Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data were used to construct Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores. Individual residential property values obtained from the King County tax assessor. Multivariable linear regressions examined socioeconomic gradient in the frequency of soda and salad consumption by residential property values, the primary independent variable, in comparison to annual household incomes and educational attainment, with adjustment for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Geographic disparities in soda and salad consumption by property value metric were illustrated at the census block level using modeled predicted marginal means. Among all three socioeconomic indicators (income, education and residential property values), residential property values captured strongest gradient in soda and salad consumption. Higher quintiles of residential property values were associated with lower soda and higher salad consumption. Respondents living in the highest quintile of property values -1.04 fewer sodas per week (95% CI= -1.87, -0.21) and 0.89 more salads per week (95% CI= 0.36, 1.42), adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Residential property values illustrated geographic disparities in soda and salad consumption at the census-block level. Geo-localized disparities in food consumption patterns by neighborhood can inform current discourse on the socioeconomic determinants of health, while providing a useful tool for targeted interventions at the local level.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Documenting geographic disparities in dietary behaviors can help inform public health interventions at the local level.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To study and visualize socioeconomic gradient in soda and salad consumption using a geo-localized measure of socioeconomic status in contrast to more traditional measures.
METHODS
METHODS
Geo-localized dietary intake data came from the Seattle Obesity Study I, a population-based sample of King County adults (n=1099). Socio-demographic data and soda and salad consumption frequencies (times/week) were obtained by 20-min telephone survey. Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data were used to construct Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores. Individual residential property values obtained from the King County tax assessor. Multivariable linear regressions examined socioeconomic gradient in the frequency of soda and salad consumption by residential property values, the primary independent variable, in comparison to annual household incomes and educational attainment, with adjustment for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Geographic disparities in soda and salad consumption by property value metric were illustrated at the census block level using modeled predicted marginal means.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among all three socioeconomic indicators (income, education and residential property values), residential property values captured strongest gradient in soda and salad consumption. Higher quintiles of residential property values were associated with lower soda and higher salad consumption. Respondents living in the highest quintile of property values -1.04 fewer sodas per week (95% CI= -1.87, -0.21) and 0.89 more salads per week (95% CI= 0.36, 1.42), adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Residential property values illustrated geographic disparities in soda and salad consumption at the census-block level.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Geo-localized disparities in food consumption patterns by neighborhood can inform current discourse on the socioeconomic determinants of health, while providing a useful tool for targeted interventions at the local level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30623013
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.100339
pii: S2352-8273(18)30111-3
pii: 100339
pmc: PMC6317301
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100339Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK076608
Pays : United States
Références
Ann Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;9(3):178-87
pubmed: 10192650
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Aug;8(8):721-5
pubmed: 10744133
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Sep;9(9):939-44
pubmed: 11008912
JAMA. 1992 Oct 21;268(15):2037-44
pubmed: 1328696
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;79(1):6-16
pubmed: 14684391
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 19;97(2):94-102
pubmed: 15657339
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jun;59(6):517-26
pubmed: 15911650
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):611-2
pubmed: 16113034
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005 Sep 05;2:11
pubmed: 16138933
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jun;31(6):968-77
pubmed: 17224932
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Dec;107(12):2071-6
pubmed: 18060892
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(1):38-46
pubmed: 18433964
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Dec;35(6):547-53
pubmed: 19000844
Obes Rev. 2009 Jul;10(4):393-402
pubmed: 19389058
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 May;109(5):814-22
pubmed: 19394467
J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1541-8
pubmed: 19535422
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(9):1306-10
pubmed: 19692161
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 12;169(18):1698-704
pubmed: 19822827
Fam Community Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):68-78
pubmed: 20010006
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):216-22
pubmed: 20019319
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S15-27
pubmed: 20943580
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):94-100
pubmed: 21146773
Health Place. 2011 Mar;17(2):438-48
pubmed: 21236721
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Sep;65(9):1059-66
pubmed: 21559042
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):88-97
pubmed: 21665069
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):e65-75
pubmed: 22516505
Int J Health Geogr. 2012 Apr 26;11:11
pubmed: 22537116
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(3):491-5
pubmed: 22591823
Am J Public Health. 2012 Aug;102(8):e74-80
pubmed: 22698052
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):921-6
pubmed: 22709817
Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1172-87
pubmed: 22717379
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):378-84
pubmed: 22992355
Obes Rev. 2013 Feb;14(2):110-28
pubmed: 23174017
Prev Med. 2013 Mar;56(3-4):218-21
pubmed: 23219681
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Apr;113(4):569-80
pubmed: 23415502
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(4):262-9
pubmed: 23448416
Int J Health Geogr. 2013 Apr 15;12:22
pubmed: 23587373
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul;98(1):180-8
pubmed: 23676424
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;98(4):1084-102
pubmed: 23966427
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2013 Oct 1;32(5):null
pubmed: 24187411
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):2001-11
pubmed: 24256379
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jul;134:20-31
pubmed: 24631301
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Apr;18(6):1091-7
pubmed: 24893111
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):260-74
pubmed: 25049218
Prev Med. 2015 Apr;73:70-5
pubmed: 25625693
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Mar;23(3):671-6
pubmed: 25684713
Nutr Rev. 2015 Oct;73(10):643-60
pubmed: 26307238
Prev Med. 2016 Feb;83:46-55
pubmed: 26657348
Ann GIS. 2015;21(2):157-168
pubmed: 27076868
Prev Med Rep. 2016 May 17;4:68-74
pubmed: 27413663
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Aug 16;8:79-87
pubmed: 28856085
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Feb;26(2):432-441
pubmed: 29134763
Obes Facts. 2017;10(6):674-693
pubmed: 29237159
Obes Sci Pract. 2017 Dec 28;4(1):14-19
pubmed: 29479460
N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1450-6
pubmed: 8479464