What are the biomechanical consequences of a structural leg length discrepancy on the adolescent spine during walking?


Journal

Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 30 09 2018
revised: 21 12 2018
accepted: 26 12 2018
pubmed: 10 1 2019
medline: 16 4 2019
entrez: 10 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Structural leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common phenomenon. However, its effect on spinal gait kinematics remains unclear. How does LLD affect spinal gait kinematics in patients with structural LLD and what is the immediate effect of a shoe lift?. 10 adolescents with structural LLD (20-60 mm) and 14 healthy controls were included. All of whom were fitted with a trunk marker set and requested to walk barefoot as well as with an orthotic shoe lift (only patients). Data were collected using a 12-camera motion capture system. Group comparisons were conducted using one-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). Patients with LLD showed statistically significant increased frontal plane lumbar bending angles to the longer side (p = 0.007), increased pelvic drop on the shorter side (p < 0.001) and increased hip adduction angles on the longer leg (p < 0.001) compared to the healthy controls. In the sagittal plane, patients demonstrated changed knee (shorter leg) and ankle joint (longer leg) motion. All gait deviations observed in patients with LLD could immediately be altered by correcting the LLD using a shoe lift. Due to the LLD, patients showed a lateral pelvic drop on the shorter side, which appeared to be compensated for by a contralateral bending in the lumbar spine and a lateral shift of the pelvis towards the longer side. In addition, the use of an orthotic correction seems to be a suitable option to instantly normalize gait kinematics in patients with mild to moderate LLD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Structural leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common phenomenon. However, its effect on spinal gait kinematics remains unclear.
RESEARCH QUESTION
How does LLD affect spinal gait kinematics in patients with structural LLD and what is the immediate effect of a shoe lift?.
METHODS
10 adolescents with structural LLD (20-60 mm) and 14 healthy controls were included. All of whom were fitted with a trunk marker set and requested to walk barefoot as well as with an orthotic shoe lift (only patients). Data were collected using a 12-camera motion capture system. Group comparisons were conducted using one-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).
RESULTS
Patients with LLD showed statistically significant increased frontal plane lumbar bending angles to the longer side (p = 0.007), increased pelvic drop on the shorter side (p < 0.001) and increased hip adduction angles on the longer leg (p < 0.001) compared to the healthy controls. In the sagittal plane, patients demonstrated changed knee (shorter leg) and ankle joint (longer leg) motion. All gait deviations observed in patients with LLD could immediately be altered by correcting the LLD using a shoe lift.
SIGNIFICANCE
Due to the LLD, patients showed a lateral pelvic drop on the shorter side, which appeared to be compensated for by a contralateral bending in the lumbar spine and a lateral shift of the pelvis towards the longer side. In addition, the use of an orthotic correction seems to be a suitable option to instantly normalize gait kinematics in patients with mild to moderate LLD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30623844
pii: S0966-6362(18)31662-X
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.040
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

506-513

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Christian Bangerter (C)

Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health Professions, Bern, Switzerland; Physio Hildebrandt, Sickingerstrasse 4, 3014 Bern, Switzerland.

Jacqueline Romkes (J)

University of Basel Children's Hospital, Laboratory for Movement Analysis, Basel, Switzerland.

Silvio Lorenzetti (S)

ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomechanics, Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen SFISM, Magglingen, Switzerland.

Andreas H Krieg (AH)

University of Basel Children's Hospital, Orthopedic Department, Basel, Switzerland.

Carol-Claudius Hasler (CC)

University of Basel Children's Hospital, Orthopedic Department, Basel, Switzerland.

Reinald Brunner (R)

University of Basel Children's Hospital, Laboratory for Movement Analysis, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel Children's Hospital, Orthopedic Department, Basel, Switzerland.

Stefan Schmid (S)

Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health Professions, Bern, Switzerland; ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomechanics, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: stefanschmid79@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH