Evaluation of pain perception during orthodontic debonding of metallic brackets with four different techniques.
Journal
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
ISSN: 1678-7765
Titre abrégé: J Appl Oral Sci
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101189774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2019
07 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
17
01
2018
accepted:
17
07
2018
entrez:
10
1
2019
pubmed:
10
1
2019
medline:
8
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' pain levels during four different debonding procedures. The null hypothesis was that the pain perception of the patients undergoing four different debonding applications was not statistically significant different. One hundred and twenty orthodontic patients who underwent orthodontic debonding were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to technique used in the patients. Debonding groups were as follows: Group 1) Conventional debonding group, Group 2) Medication group (acetaminophen was given 1 hour before debonding), Group 3) Soft bite wax group, and Group 4) Soft acrylic bite wafer group. The patients' levels of anxiety and fear of pain were evaluated before debonding, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate their pain perception during debonding. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate non-normally distributed data. Categorical data analysis were carried by chi-square and McNemar tests. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Anxiety scores of the patients were not statistically significant between both genders and debonding groups. In the quadrants in which the patients were perceived, the highest pain level was in the left side of the mandible. The teeth in which the highest pain level was perceived were the lower left and upper right lateral incisors. Although there was no statistically significant difference among the pain scores of the patients in each group, quadrant scores of female patients showed significant differences, being the lowest scores in the soft bite wax group. Majority of the patients had no fear of pain before debonding. Pain levels of the patients in the conventional debonding group were not significantly different from those of the other groups, except quadrant scores of females in the soft bite wax group. The null hypothesis was accepted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30624460
pii: S1678-77572019000100414
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0003
pmc: PMC6322637
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20180003Références
Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Sep;20(3):371-80; discussion 435-513
pubmed: 10097000
Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8
pubmed: 12013568
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Oct;102(4):373-81
pubmed: 1456222
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):79-85
pubmed: 14994886
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Apr;101(4):313-7
pubmed: 1558060
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):214-9
pubmed: 15825785
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12950-5
pubmed: 16150703
Dent Mater J. 2007 Jan;26(1):78-83
pubmed: 17410896
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):170-9
pubmed: 17488999
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):339.e1-8
pubmed: 18331926
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):46-50
pubmed: 19123718
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):349-56
pubmed: 1927986
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):160-7
pubmed: 19651344
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):807-11
pubmed: 21446869
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e29-34
pubmed: 21490985
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93
pubmed: 21621130
J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40(3):188-96
pubmed: 24009318
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:17
pubmed: 26081783
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):917-924
pubmed: 27172508
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):47-53
pubmed: 2750720
Am J Orthod. 1986 Feb;89(2):141-5
pubmed: 3511716
Br J Orthod. 1985 Oct;12(4):179-88
pubmed: 3863673
Am J Orthod. 1982 Jul;82(1):1-9
pubmed: 6961773
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9
pubmed: 8604867
Pain. 1996 May-Jun;65(2-3):123-67
pubmed: 8826503
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Sep;112(3):263-70
pubmed: 9294354