Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center.
Complications and comorbidities
Diagnostic value
Present on admission
Quality indicator
Quality of inpatient care
Routinely collected health data
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2019
09 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2017
accepted:
26
12
2018
entrez:
11
1
2019
pubmed:
11
1
2019
medline:
18
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timing is relevant with regard to the case's severity, resource consumption and quality of care. In this study we analyzed the diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission (POA) indicator using routinely collected health data. We included all inpatient cases of the department of medicine during 2016 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus ulcer or delirium. Swiss coding guidelines of 2016 and the definitions of the Swiss medical statistics of hospitals were analyzed to evaluate the potential to encode information on diagnosis timing. The diagnoses were revised by applying the information present-on-admission by a coding specialist and by a medical expert, serving as Gold Standard. The diagnostic value and reliability were evaluated. The inter-rater reliability for POA of all diagnoses was 0.7133 (Cohen's kappa), but differed between diagnosis groups (0.558-0.7164). The rate of POA positive of the total applied by the coding specialist versus the expert was similar, but differed between diagnoses. In group "thrombosis" SEN was 0.95, SPE 0.75, PPV 0.97 and NPV 0.60, in group "decubitus ulcer" SEN 0.89, SPE 0.82, PPV 0.89 and NPV 0.82, in group "delirium" SEN 0.91, SPE 0.65, PPV 0.71 and NPV 0.88 For all diagnoses SEN 0.92, SPE 0.73, PPV 0.87, NPV 0.82, summing up the cases of all diagnosis groups. Coding the POA indicator identified diagnoses which were pre-existent with insufficient reliability on individual patient's level. The overall fair to sufficient diagnostic quality is appropriate for screening and benchmarking performance on population level. As the medical statistics of hospitals carries no variable on pre-existing conditions, the novel approach to apply the POA indicator to diagnoses gives more information on quality of hospital care and complexity of cases. By preparing documentation for POA reporting diagnostic quality must be increased before implementation for risk-assessment or reimbursement on the individual patient's level.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timing is relevant with regard to the case's severity, resource consumption and quality of care. In this study we analyzed the diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission (POA) indicator using routinely collected health data.
METHODS
METHODS
We included all inpatient cases of the department of medicine during 2016 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus ulcer or delirium. Swiss coding guidelines of 2016 and the definitions of the Swiss medical statistics of hospitals were analyzed to evaluate the potential to encode information on diagnosis timing. The diagnoses were revised by applying the information present-on-admission by a coding specialist and by a medical expert, serving as Gold Standard. The diagnostic value and reliability were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The inter-rater reliability for POA of all diagnoses was 0.7133 (Cohen's kappa), but differed between diagnosis groups (0.558-0.7164). The rate of POA positive of the total applied by the coding specialist versus the expert was similar, but differed between diagnoses. In group "thrombosis" SEN was 0.95, SPE 0.75, PPV 0.97 and NPV 0.60, in group "decubitus ulcer" SEN 0.89, SPE 0.82, PPV 0.89 and NPV 0.82, in group "delirium" SEN 0.91, SPE 0.65, PPV 0.71 and NPV 0.88 For all diagnoses SEN 0.92, SPE 0.73, PPV 0.87, NPV 0.82, summing up the cases of all diagnosis groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Coding the POA indicator identified diagnoses which were pre-existent with insufficient reliability on individual patient's level. The overall fair to sufficient diagnostic quality is appropriate for screening and benchmarking performance on population level. As the medical statistics of hospitals carries no variable on pre-existing conditions, the novel approach to apply the POA indicator to diagnoses gives more information on quality of hospital care and complexity of cases. By preparing documentation for POA reporting diagnostic quality must be increased before implementation for risk-assessment or reimbursement on the individual patient's level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30626388
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3
pii: 10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3
pmc: PMC6327414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23Références
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):63-82
pubmed: 17290649
Mod Healthc. 2008 Jun 2;Suppl:10, 12
pubmed: 18711904
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2009;6:2
pubmed: 19234617
Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Summer;30(4):17-32
pubmed: 19719030
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 01;9:48
pubmed: 19951430
Qual Manag Health Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):17-24
pubmed: 20042930
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1946-62
pubmed: 22092023
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):e31-6
pubmed: 23552437
Med J Aust. 2013 Oct 21;199(8):543-7
pubmed: 24138380
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Dec 24;3(4):null
pubmed: 24834362
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):511-5
pubmed: 24990594
Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):922-38
pubmed: 25285372
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Oct 02;4(3):null
pubmed: 25343058
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Aug;27(4):328-33
pubmed: 26045514
Med Care. 2016 Dec;54(12):1105-1111
pubmed: 27116111