A cut-off value of shear wave speed to distinguish nonalcoholic steatohepatitis candidates.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
entrez:
12
1
2019
pubmed:
12
1
2019
medline:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To distinguish and characterize nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) candidates from among medical checkup visitor diagnosed with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (mcNAFLDs).A cut-off value has not been established to differentiate NASH at the earliest stage in NAFLD.Shear wave speed (SWS) was measured in the livers of 480 mcNAFLDs. NASH candidates were screened out by adopting a statistically defined cut-off value of SWS and were characterized in terms of food preference.SWS ranged between 1.11 and 2.18 m/s and fit a Gaussian distribution (r = 0.98) with an average and SD of 1.324 and 0.0847 m/s, respectively, in 320/160 males/females 64.4 (interquartile range 57.3-69.4) years old. The average plus SD (1.41 m/s) screened out 82 (17.1%) NASH candidates, who were significantly older (66.8 vs. 64.1 years old, P = 0.001) and had higher fibrosis 4 index values (1.58 vs. 1.33, P < 0.0001) than the remaining mcNAFLDs. The number of patients with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m was 118 (29.6%) mcNAFLDs and 34 (41.5%) NASH candidates, with a significantly higher frequency in NASH candidates (P = 0.05). Obese patients preferentially ate fatty acids in general, while NASH candidates preferred to consume several long-chain unsaturated fatty acids irrespective of their BMI.These results suggest that NASH candidates who have a longer disease duration and pathological progression can be distinguished from mcNAFLDs by a statistically defined cut-off value of SWS. The defined value indicates that there are different food habitats associated with obesity and NAFLD progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30633176
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013958
pii: 00005792-201901110-00027
pmc: PMC6336588
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13958Références
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;9(6):524-530.e1; quiz e60
pubmed: 21440669
Mayo Clin Proc. 1980 Jul;55(7):434-8
pubmed: 7382552
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 18;346(16):1221-31
pubmed: 11961152
Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):289-93
pubmed: 8690394
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Mar;123(3):382-7
pubmed: 15716234
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Gastroenterology. 2012 Apr;142(4):711-725.e6
pubmed: 22326434
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3282-94
pubmed: 25994191
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug 7;17(29):3377-89
pubmed: 21876630
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan 05;12:2
pubmed: 22221544
Gastroenterology. 2002 Jul;123(1):134-40
pubmed: 12105842
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jun;128(7):1898-906
pubmed: 15940625
Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2
pubmed: 21374666
J Hepatol. 2007 Apr;46(4):543-5
pubmed: 17316879
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 21;16(23):2918-25
pubmed: 20556839
Dis Model Mech. 2010 Jul-Aug;3(7-8):431-40
pubmed: 20371730
J Hepatol. 2006 Mar;44(3):462-74
pubmed: 16427156
Gastroenterology. 1975 Dec;69(6):1292-6
pubmed: 1193328
Med Ultrason. 2013 Dec;15(4):268-72
pubmed: 24286089
Hepatology. 2016 Jul;64(1):73-84
pubmed: 26707365
Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44
pubmed: 19243014
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1458-67
pubmed: 21916815
Gastroenterology. 2008 Apr;134(4):960-74
pubmed: 18395077
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6343656
pubmed: 27382367
Hepatol Int. 2014 Apr;8(2):240-9
pubmed: 26202505
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;94(9):2467-74
pubmed: 10484010
Hepatology. 2003 Dec;38(6):1449-57
pubmed: 14647056
Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):640-7
pubmed: 20529989
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):888-96
pubmed: 25393946
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jul;14(7):1200-11
pubmed: 21477414
Hepatology. 2003 Apr;37(4):917-23
pubmed: 12668987
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2010;46(2-3):159-68
pubmed: 21135491
Hepatology. 2005 Oct;42(4):905-14
pubmed: 16175602
J Clin Invest. 2005 May;115(5):1343-51
pubmed: 15864352