Improved Bioactivity of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffold with Chitosan/Magnesium-Calcium Silicate Composite for Orthopaedic Applications.
bone tissue engineering
chitosan
magnesium-calcium silicate
osteogenesis
three-dimensional scaffolds
titanium
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2019
09 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
28
10
2018
revised:
03
01
2019
accepted:
04
01
2019
entrez:
13
1
2019
pubmed:
13
1
2019
medline:
13
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently, cases of bone defects have been increasing incrementally. Thus, repair or replacement of bone defects is gradually becoming a huge problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds have since emerged as a potential candidate for bone replacement, of which titanium (Ti) alloys are one of the most promising candidates among the metal alloys due to their low cytotoxicity and mechanical properties. However, bioactivity remains a problem for metal alloys, which can be enhanced using simple immersion techniques to coat bioactive compounds onto the surface of Ti⁻6Al⁻4V scaffolds. In our study, we fabricated magnesium-calcium silicate (Mg⁻CS) and chitosan (CH) compounds onto Ti⁻6Al⁻4V scaffolds. Characterization of these surface-modified scaffolds involved an assessment of physicochemical properties as well as mechanical testing. Adhesion, proliferation, and growth of human Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs) were assessed in vitro. In addition, the cell attachment morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy to assess adhesion qualities. Osteogenic and mineralization assays were conducted to assess osteogenic expression. In conclusion, the Mg⁻CS/CH coated Ti⁻6Al⁻4V scaffolds were able to exhibit and retain pore sizes and their original morphologies and architectures, which significantly affected subsequent hard tissue regeneration. In addition, the surface was shown to be hydrophilic after modification and showed mechanical strength comparable to natural bone. Not only were our modified scaffolds able to match the mechanical properties of natural bone, it was also found that such modifications enhanced cellular behavior such as adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, which led to enhanced osteogenesis and mineralization downstream. In vivo results indicated that Mg⁻CS/CH coated Ti⁻6Al⁻4V enhances the bone regeneration and ingrowth at the critical size bone defects of rabbits. These results indicated that the proposed Mg⁻CS/CH coated Ti⁻6Al⁻4V scaffolds exhibited a favorable, inducive micro-environment that could serve as a promising modification for future bone tissue engineering scaffolds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30634440
pii: ma12020203
doi: 10.3390/ma12020203
pmc: PMC6356721
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):68-75
pubmed: 23228260
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Mar;28(3):53
pubmed: 28197824
Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Aug;16(8):2467-73
pubmed: 20214455
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Sep 1;66:84-91
pubmed: 27207041
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Oct 14;4(38):6307-6315
pubmed: 32263532
J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):818-24
pubmed: 24862709
J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1802-9
pubmed: 25218525
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1105-11
pubmed: 25069916
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Aug 1;65:1-8
pubmed: 27157721
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Dec 28;4(48):7974-7988
pubmed: 32263787
J Mater Chem B. 2013 Feb 21;1(7):1019-1026
pubmed: 32262366
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Oct 7;4(37):6200-6212
pubmed: 32263632
Materials (Basel). 2017 May 05;10(5):
pubmed: 28772861
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 Oct;43:359-66
pubmed: 25175224
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Oct 1;91:679-687
pubmed: 30033302
Acta Biomater. 2011 Jun;7(6):2604-14
pubmed: 21345382
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Mar;60:374-383
pubmed: 26706543
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Apr 1;61:534-44
pubmed: 26838881
Biofabrication. 2014 Oct 07;6(4):045007
pubmed: 25287305
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jan 1;58:1177-81
pubmed: 26478418
Materials (Basel). 2015 Jul 20;8(7):4491-4504
pubmed: 28793451
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Dec 27;29(1):11
pubmed: 29282550
J Mater Chem B. 2017 Sep 21;5(35):7297-7306
pubmed: 32264179
J Mater Chem B. 2018 May 28;6(20):3274-3284
pubmed: 32254385
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Jan 1;82:130-140
pubmed: 29025641
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Aug 21;4(31):5289-5298
pubmed: 28044100
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:757-768
pubmed: 30184804
Biomaterials. 2013 Sep;34(28):6589-606
pubmed: 23768900
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jan 1;70(Pt 1):812-823
pubmed: 27770959
Acta Biomater. 2017 Oct 1;61:217-232
pubmed: 28807800
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):963-970
pubmed: 29680723
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Nov 1;80:207-212
pubmed: 28866158
Biomaterials. 2017 Jul;133:263-274
pubmed: 28448819
Materials (Basel). 2017 Dec 22;11(1):
pubmed: 29271932
Acta Biomater. 2015 Mar;14:217-25
pubmed: 25500631
Acta Biomater. 2017 Feb;49:575-589
pubmed: 27888100
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 29;11(4):
pubmed: 29596320
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015 Sep;54:20-5
pubmed: 26046263
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015 Nov 1;56:473-80
pubmed: 26249617
J Mater Chem B. 2017 Feb 21;5(7):1388-1399
pubmed: 32264631
Materials (Basel). 2017 Oct 27;10(11):
pubmed: 29077014
Materials (Basel). 2018 Sep 09;11(9):
pubmed: 30205589
Materials (Basel). 2017 Mar 07;10(3):
pubmed: 28772630
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Jun 1;75:620-628
pubmed: 28415507
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Apr 1;73:726-735
pubmed: 28183667
Materials (Basel). 2018 Sep 09;11(9):
pubmed: 30205596
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Nov;39:79-86
pubmed: 25108271
J Endod. 2017 Jan;43(1):69-76
pubmed: 27939733