Review of pig health and welfare surveillance data sources in England and Wales.


Journal

The Veterinary record
ISSN: 2042-7670
Titre abrégé: Vet Rec
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0031164

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 03 2019
Historique:
received: 16 02 2018
revised: 26 10 2018
accepted: 16 12 2018
pubmed: 13 1 2019
medline: 9 6 2020
entrez: 13 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The capability to set baselines and monitor trends of health and welfare conditions is an important requirement for livestock industries in order to maintain economic competitiveness and sustainability. Monitoring schemes evaluate the relative importance of conditions so that: appropriate actions can be determined, prioritised and implemented; new and (re)emerging conditions can be promptly detected and the effectiveness of any actions can be measured. In 2011, the national pig levy board published a strategy document highlighting health and welfare conditions of importance to the pig industry that were to be targeted for control. In this study, existing schemes that could be used to monitor or set baselines for these conditions in pigs were reviewed, in order to evaluate their suitability for this purpose, using a standardised surveillance evaluation framework (SERVAL). The schemes included: government-funded surveillance of endemic and exotic disease and pig welfare; industry surveillance of endemic diseases; regional schemes for improving pig health; national accreditation schemes and information collected by retailers, private veterinary practices and private laboratories. The evaluation of each scheme highlights its capability to monitor any of the targeted conditions. This study identifies the biases, strengths and gaps in each scheme and provides discussion of opportunities for future development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30635452
pii: vr.104896
doi: 10.1136/vr.104896
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

349

Informations de copyright

© British Veterinary Association 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Richard P Smith (RP)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.

Carla Correia-Gomes (C)

Epidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.

Susanna Williamson (S)

APHA-Bury St Edmunds, Bury St Edmunds, UK.

Elizabeth A Marier (EA)

Veterinary Medicine Directorate, Addlestone, UK.

Daniel Gilson (D)

Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.

Sue C Tongue (SC)

Epidemiology Research Unit, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH