Rumination related activity in brain networks mediating attentional switching in euthymic bipolar patients.
Attentional switch
Bipolar disorder
RRS
Rumination
Self-reference
sgACC
Journal
International journal of bipolar disorders
ISSN: 2194-7511
Titre abrégé: Int J Bipolar Disord
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101622983
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jan 2019
12 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
17
06
2018
accepted:
22
10
2018
entrez:
15
1
2019
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
15
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mood disorder patients have a tendency to be more internally oriented, with difficulties in switching attentional focus, which might result in the generation of negative thoughts, such as rumination. The present study explored self-referential neural activity correlating with rumination tendency and attentional switching capacity in bipolar disorder. Twenty euthymic bipolar patients and twenty matched healthy controls underwent a novel introspection task of switching between internally and externally focused attention during a word processing task, while their brain activity was assessed using functional MRI. During internal focus, higher activity in self-related regions (mPFC, PCC) was found in euthymic bipolar patients as compared to controls, verifying the hypothesis of exaggerated recruitment of self-referential processes in bipolar subjects. Switching from internal to external focus revealed higher parahippocampal activity in patients as compared to controls, additionally more pronounced when switching away from negative as compared to positive self-referential information. Furthermore, rumination traits correlated with activity in PCC, subgenual and pregenual ACC, and bilateral anterior insula during repetition of internal focus, specifically when evaluating negative words. Finally, we used ACC subregions that correlated with tendency to ruminate as seeds for a whole brain connectivity analysis. Patients showed stronger connectivity between sgACC (seed), pgACC, dPFC, and anterior insula during internal focus, whereas pgACC (seed) was more strongly connected to parahippocampal gyrus when switching from internal to external focus. These findings reveal an overactive rumination-related network whose activity is enhanced by negative information in euthymic bipolar patients, which could possibly contribute to impaired switching of thoughts away from internal attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30637531
doi: 10.1186/s40345-018-0137-5
pii: 10.1186/s40345-018-0137-5
pmc: PMC6330377
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3Subventions
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : 32003B_156914
Organisme : NCCR - Synapsy
ID : Swiss National Science Foundation grant number 51NF40- 158776
Références
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Aug;109(3):504-11
pubmed: 11016119
Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):651-60
pubmed: 15748841
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):440-57
pubmed: 16466680
Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
pubmed: 17234951
Mol Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;13(9):829, 833-57
pubmed: 18574483
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(2):153-63
pubmed: 18689286
CNS Spectr. 2008 Aug;13(8):663-81
pubmed: 18704022
Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1188-200
pubmed: 18973817
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 1;65(5):361-6
pubmed: 19058792
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4618
pubmed: 19242539
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Dec;4(4):313-27
pubmed: 19620180
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):192-216
pubmed: 19693001
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;174(3):195-201
pubmed: 19910166
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1862-8
pubmed: 20176041
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285-312
pubmed: 20192795
Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):451-63
pubmed: 20490545
Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):535-49
pubmed: 20512367
Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):655-67
pubmed: 20512370
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Dec;10(4):470-8
pubmed: 21098808
J Affect Disord. 2012 Jan;136(1-2):e1-e11
pubmed: 21185083
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):979-83
pubmed: 21742932
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):748-57
pubmed: 21972982
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;43(3):910-4
pubmed: 22365906
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):570-8
pubmed: 22468767
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Mar 31;201(3):196-205
pubmed: 22510433
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;169(7):693-703
pubmed: 22535198
Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Sep;22(3):229-51
pubmed: 22569771
BMC Neurosci. 2012 May 24;13:52
pubmed: 22624857
Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jan 23;2:2
pubmed: 22738363
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):307-15
pubmed: 23202660
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):334-44
pubmed: 23334445
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e62514
pubmed: 23638104
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2529-53
pubmed: 23928089
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;203(3):310-1
pubmed: 23969484
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;18(8):422-8
pubmed: 24835467
Biol Psychol. 2014 Dec;103:195-202
pubmed: 25240323
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:267-279
pubmed: 25264228
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 15;78(4):224-30
pubmed: 25861700
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24
pubmed: 26158958
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;25(6):625-38
pubmed: 26438382
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145826
pubmed: 26716447
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Apr;37(4):1335-48
pubmed: 26787138
Brain Behav. 2015 Oct 21;5(12):e00409
pubmed: 26807336
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:390-397
pubmed: 26892855
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;34:56-63
pubmed: 26945530
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):472-80
pubmed: 27150382
Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 8;6(11):e944
pubmed: 27824358
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Mar;90:123-136
pubmed: 28049069
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:381-389
pubmed: 28110087
Psychol Med. 2017 Dec;47(16):2892-2905
pubmed: 28587689
Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;4(5):835-857
pubmed: 28785510
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:123-132
pubmed: 28951165
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9
pubmed: 444788
Br J Psychiatry. 1978 Nov;133:429-35
pubmed: 728692